Indian Journal of Cancer
Home  ICS  Feedback Subscribe Top cited articles Login 
Users Online :179
Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Navigate here
  Search
 
  
   
  Table of Contents
  
Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
   Article in PDF (2,050 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   References
   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2494    
    Printed73    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded175    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 47  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 483-485
 

Pilomatrixoma misdiagnosed as round cell tumor on fine-needle aspiration cytology


Department of Pathology, Giansagar Medical College and Hospital, Banur, Dist Patiala, Punjab, India

Date of Web Publication4-Dec-2010

Correspondence Address:
L Agrawal
Department of Pathology, Giansagar Medical College and Hospital, Banur, Dist Patiala, Punjab
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-509X.73565

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Agrawal L, Kaur P, Singh J, Singh N. Pilomatrixoma misdiagnosed as round cell tumor on fine-needle aspiration cytology. Indian J Cancer 2010;47:483-5

How to cite this URL:
Agrawal L, Kaur P, Singh J, Singh N. Pilomatrixoma misdiagnosed as round cell tumor on fine-needle aspiration cytology. Indian J Cancer [serial online] 2010 [cited 2018 Aug 21];47:483-5. Available from: http://www.indianjcancer.com/text.asp?2010/47/4/483/73565


Sir,

Pilomatrixoma or calcifying epithelioma of Malherbe is a benign appendageal tumor with differentiation toward hair cortex cells and accounts for almost 20% of pilar tumors. It usually occurs as a solitary lesion on the face or upper extremities and is composed of 2 types of cells: basaloid cells and shadow cells, present in irregularly shaped islands and separated by a cellular stroma. [1] There is a tendency for basaloid cells to be overrepresented in fine-needle aspiration (FNA) smears, probably because they are more easily detached by the needle. This often leads to an erroneous cytological diagnosis. [2]

We report a case of pilomatrixoma, which was misdiagnosed on fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) as round cell tumor.

The patient was a 16-year-old male, who presented with a rapidly enlarging, painless 1.5 Χ 1 cm nodule in the right posterior cervical region for 2 months. A clinical impression of the posterior cervical lymphadenopathy was made and an FNA was requested.

FNAC smears were cellular, showing cells with round to ovoid nuclei, 1-3 prominent nucleoli and scanty cytoplasm, dispersed singly as well as in clusters [Figure 1]. Rosette-like appearance was seen in an occasional cluster. Nuclear molding was also noted in some of them. Few foreign-body type giant cells were also encountered. A diagnosis of round cell tumor was made and excision biopsy was advised.
Figure 1 :Photomicrograph showing clusters of round, basaloid cells, some exhibiting nuclear molding, in the fine-needle aspiration smear.

Click here to view


Histopathologic examination of the excised specimen showed the typical histology of pilomatrixoma [Figure 2].
Figure 2 :High-power view showing basaloid cells and ghost cells (HandE, ×400). The inset shows foreign body giant cell reaction (HandE, ×400).

Click here to view


Pilomatrixoma may arise in persons of any age, but 60% occur in the first 2 decades of life. [1] It has been variably misinterpreted as round cell tumor, [3] squamous cell carcinoma, [4] or even as metastatic carcinoma. [4]

The cytologic diagnosis is based on the combination of basaloid cells, ghost cells, and foreign-body giant cells against an inflammatory background. Basaloid cells can be seen as single cells, in clusters, sheets, or as bare nuclei in the background. Ghost cells are usually seen in clusters.

The above-mentioned diagnostic triad may not necessarily be present in all cases, especially when the aspirate is from the periphery or from an early lesion. Smears that show mainly basaloid cells can be easily misinterpreted as small round cell tumor because of their high nucleus:cytoplasmic ratio, slight nuclear hyperchromasia, and presence of nucleoli. On the other end of the spectrum, when ghost cells and foreign body giant cells predominate, the cytologic features can even mimic epidermal inclusion cyst or giant cell lesions. [4]

Rapidly growing, early lesions of pilomatrixoma, predominantly composed of basaloid cells may lead to a misdiagnosis as a metastatic deposit. [4] This possibility was also considered by us, but the age of the patient and lack of significant nuclear pleomorphism made us favor a diagnosis of round cell tumor. We were unable to find ghost cells even after careful retrospective analysis of the slides. However, lack of shadow cells does not preclude correct diagnosis in the presence of the other relevant cytologic features. [5] Appreciation of the 2 different cell types, along with correlation with the clinical presentation should help the cytopathologist to arrive at a correct diagnosis.

 
  References Top

1.Klein W, Chan E, Seykora JT. Tumors of the epidermal appendages. In: Elder DE, Elenitsas R, Johnson BL, Murphy JF, editors. Lever's Histopathology of the Skin. 9 th ed. Philadelphia (USA): Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2005. p. 879.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Orell SR, Sterrett GF, Whitaker D. Skin and subcutis. Fine needle aspiration cytology. 4 th ed. New Delhi (India): Elsevier Limited; 2005. p. 399.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Thapliyal N, Joshi U, Vaibhav G, Sayana A, Srivastava AK, Jha RS. Pilomatricoma mimicking small round cell tumor on fine needle aspiration cytology: A case report. Acta Cytol 2008;52:627-30.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Preethi TR, Jayasree K, Abraham EK. A case of pilomatrixoma misdiagnosed as metastatic carcinoma on fine needle aspiration cytology. J Cytol 2007;24:207-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
  Medknow Journal  
5.Dubb M, Michelow P. Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Pilomatrixoma and Differential Diagnoses. Acta Cytol 2009;53:683-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]

This article has been cited by
1 Diagnostic pitfalls of pilomatricoma on fine needle aspiration cytology
Gupta, V. and Marwah, N. and Jain, P. and Dua, S. and Gupta, S. and Sen, R.
Iranian Journal of Dermatology. 2012; 15(60): 59-61
[Pubmed]
2 Cytodiagnosis of pilomatrixoma from an uncommon site with unusual presentation
Phukan, J.P. and Sinha, A. and Biswas, S.
International Journal of Trichology. 2012; 4(4): 280-282
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article

    

  Site Map | What's new | Copyright and Disclaimer
  Online since 1st April '07
  2007 - Indian Journal of Cancer | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow