Indian Journal of Cancer
Home  ICS  Feedback Subscribe Top cited articles Login 
Users Online :727
Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Navigate here
  Search
 
  
Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
   Article in PDF (911 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   References
   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2499    
    Printed70    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded242    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
  Table of Contents  
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 48  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 276-277
 

Atypical solitary enchondroma of radius


Department of Orthopaedics, MES Medical College, Palachode P.O., Perinthalmanna, Kerala, India

Date of Web Publication11-Jul-2011

Correspondence Address:
P G Vijay
Department of Orthopaedics, MES Medical College, Palachode P.O., Perinthalmanna, Kerala
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-509X.82907

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Vijay P G, Asharaf A, Jayaprakash U. Atypical solitary enchondroma of radius. Indian J Cancer 2011;48:276-7

How to cite this URL:
Vijay P G, Asharaf A, Jayaprakash U. Atypical solitary enchondroma of radius. Indian J Cancer [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 Aug 20];48:276-7. Available from: http://www.indianjcancer.com/text.asp?2011/48/2/276/82907


Sir,

'Approximately 35% of all enchondromas arise in the hand', [1] followed by femur, humerus, and tibia. 'Solitary enchondroma of radius is rare'. [2] Even after extensive literature search, reference for exact incidence of solitary enchondroma in radius is not found, although '1% incidence is quoted for radius and ulna'. [3] Only one out of 136 cases in Huvos series, [4] occurred in the radius (metaphyseal region). 'Typical enchondroma is an incidental finding, while atypical is associated with pain'. [5] We are presenting a rare case of atypical (associated with pain) solitary enchondroma of radius.

An 18 - year-old female presented with pain in the left forearm for about 4 weeks. Pain started after lifting weights and aggravated by physical work. There was no history of night pain. There was a similar episode of pain 1-year back, which was treated by a nature bonesetter by immobilizing the limb for about 4 weeks. After that, the patient was relatively symptom-free.

X-ray [Figure 1] showed multiple radioluscent lesions in the middle and distal radial diaphysis extending into metaphysis. Faintly opaque radioluscent area and mild-endosteal erosions seen in two to three sites; bony expansion was noted at two sites. There was no obvious pathological fracture, calcification, or soft tissue involvement.
Figure 1: Preoperative X-ray

Click here to view


Routine blood examination, calcium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase, PTH assay, skeletal survey were all normal. The preoperative differential diagnoses considered are fibrous dysplasia, simple bone cyst, and enchondroma.

Intraoperatively 9 cm long and 2 cm wide lesion was seen. Most of the dorsal cortices were weak and a pale blue cartilaginous tissue was curetted out. Curettage and bone grafting of the residual defect with ipsilateral fibula slices were done through a dorsal approach [Figure 2]a and b. Postoperatively, the patient was immobilized with cast for 8 weeks. Histopathology showed cartilaginous hypercellular areas without pleomorphism, binucleate cells, and marrow infiltration [Figure 3].
Figure 2: (a) Four weeks postoperative AP. (b) Four weeks postoperative lateral

Click here to view
Figure 3: Histopathology

Click here to view


At 2-year follow up, patient was found to be completely symptom-free, have full ROM(range of motion) and back to normal activities [Figure 4]. X-ray showed almost full graft incorporation 'Typical enchondromas showed benign biologic behavior, where atypical is a more ominous condition, may be associated with a malignant change (low-grade chondrosrcoma)'. [5] Chondrosrcomas, if missed usually recur in 2 years, but needs follow up for 10 years.
Figure 4: Two year follow up

Click here to view


Pain can be caused by weakening of bone, which may undergo stress fracture after strenuous activities. We could not find out any obvious fracture preoperatively or intraoperatively. Any patient that experiences sudden pain after physical stress is more likely to have an enchondroma rather than a chondrosarcoma. [1] In chondrosarcoma, pain is usually insidious and progressive. 'Soft tissue mass and night pain is present in >20% cases'. [5]

Radiological features such as cortical destruction, periosteal reaction, and soft tissue mass strongly suggest the diagnosis of chondrosarcoma. The differentiation between enchondroma and grade 1 chondrosarcoma can be quite difficult histologically. The cytological features often overlap.

The differentiation of solitary enchondroma and chondrosarcoma is based on clinical, radiological, and histopathological findings. Our patient does not have any features of chondrosarcoma at 2 years, although she needs more follow up.

 
  References Top

1.Athanasian EA. Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors. In: Green DP, editor. Green's Operative Hand Surgery. 5 th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005. p. 2228-51.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Parkinson RW, Paton RW, Noble J, Freemont AJ. Pathologic fracture through a solitary enchondroma of the radial diaphysis: Case report. J Trauma 1991;31:284-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Wilner D. Benign bone tumors and tumorous conditions of bone. In: Wilner D, editor. Radiology of bone tumors and allied disorders. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1982. p. 387-412.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Huvos AG. Bone Tumours: Diagnosis, Treatment and Prognosis. Philaldelphia: Saunders; 1979. p. 152.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Mirra JM, Eckardt JJ. Intramedullary Cartilage and Chondroid producing Tumors. In: Mirra JM, editor. Bone tumors: Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic correlations. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1989. p. 439-690.  Back to cited text no. 5
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

  Site Map | What's new | Copyright and Disclaimer
  Online since 1st April '07
  2007 - Indian Journal of Cancer | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow