Indian Journal of Cancer
Home  ICS  Feedback Subscribe Top cited articles Login 
Users Online :1816
Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Navigate Here
 »   Next article
 »   Previous article
 »   Table of Contents

Resource Links
 »   Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
 »   Citation Manager
 »   Access Statistics
 »   Reader Comments
 »   Email Alert *
 »   Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3866    
    Printed142    
    Emailed3    
    PDF Downloaded430    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 10    

Recommend this journal

 

 ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 48  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 328-334

The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostic evaluation of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors


1 Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 601 North Caroline Street, Baltimore, MD, USA
2 Russell H. Morgan Department of Pathology The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 601 North Caroline Street, Baltimore, MD, USA
3 Russell H. Morgan Department of Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 601 North Caroline Street, Baltimore, MD, USA

Correspondence Address:
A Chhabra
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 601 North Caroline Street, Baltimore, MD
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 21921333

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Background and Aims: Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are the leading cause of mortality in patients with neurofibromatosis type-1 (NF1)); however, they may also arise sporadically. Differences in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features between MPNSTs arising in NF1 subjects versus non-NF1 subjects have not been studied before. The accuracy of MRI in distinguishing MPNSTs from benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors (BPNSTs) has also been debated. The objective of this study was to determine the potential differentiating MRI features between (a) NF1-related and non-NF1-related MPNSTs and (b) MPNSTs and BPNSTs. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the MRI studies of 21 patients (12 NF1 subjects and nine non-NF1 subjects) with MPNSTs and 35 patients with BPNSTs. In all studies, the lesions were assessed in terms of size, margins, T1 and T2 signal characteristics, internal architecture, pattern of contrast enhancement, invasion of adjacent structures and necrosis/cystic degeneration as well as for the presence of tail-, target- and split-fat signs. Results: MPNSTs of NF1 subjects occurred at an earlier age and displayed a higher incidence of necrosis/cystic degeneration compared with MPNSTs of non-NF1 subjects. Compared with BPNSTs, MPNSTs were significantly larger at the time of diagnosis and demonstrated a higher incidence of ill-defined margins (specificity 91%, sensitivity 52%) and invasion of adjacent structures (specificity 100%, sensitivity 43%). Conclusions: Differences exist between NF1-related and non-NF1-related MPNSTs regarding the age of occurrence and MRI appearance. In the MRI evaluation of peripheral nerve sheath tumors, the presence of ill-defined tumor margins and/or invasion of adjacent structures are highly specific for malignancy.






[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*


        
Print this article     Email this article

  Site Map | What's new | Copyright and Disclaimer
  Online since 1st April '07
  © 2007 - Indian Journal of Cancer | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow