Indian Journal of Cancer
Home  ICS  Feedback Subscribe Top cited articles Login 
Users Online :2446
Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Navigate here
  Search
 
  
Resource links
 »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
 »  Article in PDF (399 KB)
 »  Citation Manager
 »  Access Statistics
 »  Reader Comments
 »  Email Alert *
 »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
 »  Abstract
 » Introduction
 » Case Reports
 » Discussion
 »  References
 »  Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2728    
    Printed123    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded386    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal

 

  Table of Contents  
GENITOURINARY - CASE REPORT
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 48  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 496-499
 

Periampullary carcinoid: An uncommon tumor at an unusual site


Department of Gastroenterology, I.M.S., B.H.U. Varanasi, India

Date of Web Publication25-Jan-2012

Correspondence Address:
A Somani
Department of Gastroenterology, I.M.S., B.H.U. Varanasi
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-509X.92255

Rights and Permissions

 » Abstract 

Gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors represent a group of well-differentiated tumors originating from various neuroendocrine cells located in the gastrointestinal mucosa and submucosa. Consequently, there is diversity in their clinical presentation, incidence at specific anatomic sites, biological behavior, hormone production, morphologic characteristics, and immunophenotype. Periampullary carcinoids are extremely rare and less then 100 patients have been reported in the world literature, that too mostly as case reports. We are reporting two cases of periampullary carcinoids, one of which presented with rare manifestation as gastrointestinal bleed and both are doing well after successful pancreatoduodenectomy.


Keywords: Carcinoid tumors, gastrointestinal bleed, periampullary


How to cite this article:
Somani A, Jain A K, Dixit V K. Periampullary carcinoid: An uncommon tumor at an unusual site. Indian J Cancer 2011;48:496-9

How to cite this URL:
Somani A, Jain A K, Dixit V K. Periampullary carcinoid: An uncommon tumor at an unusual site. Indian J Cancer [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 Dec 7];48:496-9. Available from: http://www.indianjcancer.com/text.asp?2011/48/4/496/92255



 » Introduction Top


The carcinoid tumors are classified as neuroendocrine or amine precursor uptake and decarboxylation (APUD) tumors and are most common endocrine tumors comprising 50% of all NETs of the gastrointestinal tract. [1] They were first described in 1888 by Lubarsch, and the term "karzinoide tumoren" was used in 1907 by Oberndorfer. [2] They are classified according to the embryologic site of origin into foregut, including bronchus (20-30%), midgut (55-65%), and hindgut (5-10%). [3] Age-adjusted incidence rates for all types of carcinoids is 1.2-2.1/100,000 population/year [4] and it varies with gender, age, and race. However, in autopsies, the incidental finding of these tumors is much higher (up to 0.5-1%), with the main location being the small intestine. [5] The overall incidence of carcinoid tumors appears to have increased in the past decades, possibly as a result of improved detection rate. [6]

Carcinoid tumors of the ampulla of Vater are extremely rare. [7],[8],[9],[10] They most commonly present with obstructive symptoms causing jaundice and nonspecific abdominal discomfort. Preoperative diagnosis is difficult due to their relatively small size and submucosal location. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy can show an obstructive tumor within periampullary region in most patients and the diagnosis can be confirmed by histology. Pancreatoduodenectomy or local excision is the standard curative modality. When necessary, excellent palliation may be achieved by surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or by pharmacologic therapy (somatostatin, interferon-alpha).


 » Case Reports Top


Case 1

A 36-year-old female presented with slowly progressive jaundice and cholestatic symptoms since 2 months. Except for icteric sclera and few scratch marks on body, rest of the physical examination was unremarkable. Abdominal ultrasonographic imaging showed dilated common bile duct (12.6 mm) and intrahepatic biliary radicals. An endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was performed which demonstrated a 2-cm smooth polypous mass with intact mucosa at the ampulla of Vater. Histological examination of biopsy specimen repeatedly failed to detect any tumor. The patient had undergone pancreatoduodenectomy, and subsequent histology results were consistent with carcinoid tumor.

Relevant laboratory data included the following values: hemoglobin, 11.8 g; prothrombin time, 14.9/14.2 sec; total bilirubin, 7.5; direct bilirubin, 6.1; albumin, 3.8 g/dl; alkaline phosphatase, 724 u/l; AST, 98; and ALT, 116. Stool examination demonstrated guaiac-negative, clay-colored stool. She was discharged on postoperative day 12 after an uncomplicated course. The final pathological finding was that of a 2.5 × 1.5 cm ampullary carcinoid, covered by intact mucosa, infiltrating the common bile duct and pancreatic duct into the submucosa and muscularis propria of the duodenum. Resected margins along with lymph nodes were free from tumor. Ten months after resection, the patient is doing well with no evidence of the disease.

Case 2

A 48-year-old male was admitted in Dec 2000 with upper gastrointestinal bleed of one day. Physical examination was normal except for tachycardia (108/min) and exaggerated bowel sounds (8-10/min). Endoscopy revealed small ulcer in duodenal bulb and antral biopsy was positive for rapid urease test. With the diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease, patient was discharged on anti Helicobacter pylori medications. He was asymptomatic until December 2005 when he again developed two episodes of melena. Endoscopic study of the duodenum revealed a raised polypous tumor measuring 3 × 2 cm near the ampulla of Vater with ulcerated mucosal surface in center. Histology showed carcinoid tumor with immunohistochemistry-positive for neuron-specific enolase, chromogranin A, and synaptophysin. Contrast enhanced CT abdomen showed mild mural thickening with poor filling in second part of duodenum with no evidence of metastasis.

Relevant laboratory data included the following values: hemoglobin, 9.5 g; TLC, 8500; general blood picture showing mild anisocytosis, poikilocytosis and hypochromasia. Coagulation profile, liver and renal function tests were normal. 24 hours urinary 5-HIAA was 16 mg. The patient underwent pancreatoduodenectomy with extensive lymph node dissection. Fourteen days postoperatively he was discharged, and he had been doing well after 11 months of follow-up.


 » Discussion Top


Periampullary carcinoid is a rare tumor [7],[8],[9],[10] with less than 100 cases, reported in world literature and that too mostly as case reports. Upper gastrointestinal bleed is a rare presenting feature (<3%) of periampullary carcinoid tumor [9] as seen in our second patient. The first patient presented with obstructive jaundice which is a common (>60%) [9] presentation in this disease. Other presenting features are upper abdominal discomfort (40%), weight loss (10%), and acute pancreatitis (5%). [9] A preoperative diagnosis of carcinoid tumor was established after histological and immunohistochemical analysis of endoscopic biopsy specimen in our patient who presented with gastrointestinal bleed, but was not possible in the patient who had common presenting symptom, i.e., jaundice. This discrepancy appears to be related to nature of lesion which was ulcerative in patient presenting with gastrointestinal bleed where biopsy from the edge of ulcer was diagnostic. However, those having smooth polypous mass covered by intact mucosa have deeper located tumor, where superficial biopsies may be unrewarding and burrow (tunnel) biopsies are needed to establish the histological nature of the tumor. [8] Lower success rates in establishing preoperative diagnosis (<15%) had been documented in previous reports as well. [11]

Although the second case had an upper gastrointestinal bleeding episode 5 years prior to the diagnosis, but chances of missing the carcinoid tumor at that stage was less likely. Since, during first bleeding episode, endoscopy showed small ulcer in duodenal bulb without any mass lesion or narrowing in duodenum. But during second bleeding episode endoscopy revealed a raised polypous tumor near the ampulla of Vater with ulcerated mucosal surface. In addition, the patient was completely asymptomatic for 5 years which seems unlikely with gastrin producing (G cell) carcinoid tumors. Moreover ampullary carcinoids often exhibit psammoma bodies and express somatostatin. [10],[12]

Attempts have been made to distinguish periampullary carcinoids from other periampullary tumors on features like lower mean age of presentation (5 th -6 th decade), longer duration of symptoms before diagnosis (>3 months), and associated neurofibromatosis 1 (>25%). [9],[13],[14] However, in both of our patients, age was less than 50 years, duration between onset of symptoms and diagnosis was less than 2 months, and none had cutaneous neurofibromas or cafe au lait spots.

The association between periampullary carcinoids and neurofibromatosis type 1 is well established with one-fourth of the periampullary carcinoid patients having neurofibromatosis type 1, [9],[13],[14] and vice versa up to 12% of neurofibromatosis type 1 patients develop an upper gastrointestinal carcinoid tumor, characteristically in the periampullary region (54%). Klein et al.[13] suggested that patients with neurofibromatosis and abdominal pain or jaundice should be evaluated for the possibility of an ampullary tumor.

None of our patients were having features suggestive of carcinoid syndrome which is consistent with previous reports of rarity of carcinoid syndrome in ampullary carcinoids (<3%). [9],[15] Both of our patients are surviving after ten and eleven months of follow-up which is expected in view of earlier reports of more then 90%, 5 year survival. [9]

In most instances, carcinoid tumors are discovered incidentally during surgery, endoscopy, or imaging studies. They may cause symptoms either through their mass effect (pain or luminal obstruction) or through their secretory products (carcinoid syndrome). Obstruction may be due to direct tumor growth or by the intense desmoplastic reaction and may cause dysphagia, abdominal pain, weight loss, changes in bowel function (e.g., constipation, diarrhea), or gastrointestinal bleeding. Systemic signs and symptoms (carcinoid syndrome) are usually not present unless secretory products (like serotonin, histamine, tachykinin, norepinephrine) are directly released into the systemic circulation.

Biochemical diagnosis is established by the elevation of plasma chromogranin A (CgA), serotonin, or urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), while anatomic localization is by octreoscan, computerized axial tomography (CAT) scan, Barium examinations, mesenteric angiography, MRI, PET scans or endoscopy/ultrasound. CT may show the characteristic "spokewheel" pattern secondary to desmoplasia. Histological identification is confirmed by CgA and synaptophysin immunohistochemistry. Primary therapy is surgical excision to avert local manifestations and decrease hormone secretion. Hepatic metastases may be amenable to cytoreduction, radiofrequency ablation, embolization alone, or with cytotoxics. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy have minimal efficacy. Intravenously administered receptor-targeted radiolabeled somatostatin analogs are of use in disseminated disease.

The overall 5-year survival rate for all carcinoid tumors (regardless of site or stage) ranges from 70% to 80%. [4],[9],[16] Stage of disease influences the prognosis significantly, with the best 5-year survival rate in localized disease (93%) and a poor 5-year survival rate with distant metastatic disease (20-30%). Tumor characteristics suggestive of increased metastatic risk are invasion into the muscularis propria, size greater than 2 cm, and presence of mitotic figures. [17] [Figure 1]
Figure 1: (a) Histologic, (b) endoscopic, (c) barium meal follow through, and (d) CT appearance of periampullary carcinoid

Click here to view


In periampullary carcinoids, size has no relation to metastatic potential, [9],[18] unlike carcinoids in other areas. The tumor usually is approximately 2 cm in diameter (range 0.5-6 cm). In one large review, 44% of tumors larger than 2 cm and 46% of tumors smaller than 2 cm had metastasis to lymph nodes or liver. [9] The appropriate treatment guidelines for periampullary carcinoids are yet to evolve due to paucity of literature. However, given the propensity for patients with ampullary tumors smaller than 2 cm to have node-positive disease and considering the safety of pancreaticoduodenectomy in experienced hands, radical excision may be the treatment of choice to ensure complete resection. Also local resection is technically difficult if the ampulla is in proximity to the lesion. [19] However, long-term survival can also be achieved by local excision. Close follow-up after surgical resection is indicated as carcinoid tumors may metastasize. [11],[15]

Prognostically, carcinoid of the ampulla of Vater is an almost benign disease. Five-year survival is 90%, and the literature shows only 4 (6%) patients dying of metastatic and progressive tumor diseases. [9]

 
 » References Top

1.Vinik AI. Neoplasms of the gastroenteropancreatic endocrine system. In: Holland JF, Frei E III, Bast RC Jr, Kufe DW, Morton DL, Weichselbaum RR, editors. Cancer medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger; 1993. p.1180-209.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Oberndorfer S. Karzinoide tumoren des dunndarms. Frankf Zschr Pathol 1907;1:426-30.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Williams ED, Sandler M. The classification of carcinoid tumours. Lancet 1963;1:238-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Modlin IM, Sandor A. An analysis of 8,305 cases of carcinoid tumors. Cancer 1997;79:813-29.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Norheim I, Oberg K, Theodorsson-Norheim E, Lindgren PG, Lundqvist G, Magnusson A, et al. Malignant carcinoid tumors: An analysis of 103 patients with regard to tumor localization, hormone production and survival. Ann Surg 1987;206:115-25.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
6.Hemminki K, Li X. Incidence trends and risk factors of carcinoid tumors: A nationwide epidemiologic study from Sweden. Cancer 2001;92:2204-10.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.Warren WK, McDonald MW, Humelogan JC. Periampullary and duodenal carcinoid tumors. Gut 1964;5:448-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Barber PV. Carcinoid tumor of the ampulla of Vater associated with cutaneous neurofibromatosis. Postgrad Med J 1976;52:514-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
9.Hatzitheokiltos E, Buchler MW, Friess H, Poch B, Ebert M, Mohr W, et al. Carcinoid of the ampulla of Vater: Clinical characteristics and morphologic features. Cancer 1994;73:1580-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Makhlouf HR, Burke AP, Sobin LH. Carcinoid tumors of the ampulla of Vater: A comparison with duodenal carcinoid tumors. Cancer 1999;85:1241-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.Mergener K, Gottfried MR, Feldman JM, Branch MS. Carcinoid of the ampulla of Vater presenting as acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:2426-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.Burke AP, Federspiel BH, Sobin LH, Shekitka KM, Helwig EB. Carcinoids of the duodenum: A histologic and immunohistochemical study of 65 tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 1989;13:828-37.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.Klein A, Clemens J, Cameron J. Periampullary neoplasms in von Recklinghausen's disease. Surgery 1989;206:815-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Burke AP, Sobin LH, Shekitka KM, Federspiel BF, Helwig EB. Somatostatin-producing duodenal carcinoids in patients with von Recklinghausen's neurofibromatosis: A predilection for black patients. Cancer 1990;65:1591-5.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Walton GF, Gibbs ER, Spencer GO, Laws HL. Carcinoid tumors of the ampulla of Vater. Am Surg 1997;63:302-4.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    
16.Quaedvlieg PF, Visser O, Lamers CB, Janssen-Heijen ML, Taal BG. Epidemiology and survival in patients with carcinoid disease in The Netherlands. An epidemiological study with 2391 patients. Ann Oncol 2001;12:1295-300.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
17.Burke AP, Federspiel BH, Sobin LH, Shekitka KM, Helwig EB. Carcinoids of the duodenum: A histologic and immunohistochemical study of 65 tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 1989;13:828-37.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    
18.Liu K, Mergener K, Feldman JM, Goufried MR. Carcinoids of the ampulla of Vater: A unique subset of gastrointestinal carcinoids. Mod Pathol 1997;11:59A.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Clements WM, Martin SP, Stemmerman G, Lowy AM. Ampullary carcinoid tumors: Rationale for an aggressive surgical approach. J Gastrointest Surg 2003;7:773-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  


    Figures

  [Figure 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome Associated with von Recklinghausen Disease: Case Report and Literature Review
Mohamad J. Alshikho,Salem I. Noureldine,Joud M. Talas,Antoine Nasimian,Safi Zazou,Bashir Mobaed,Mahmoud Nasser
American Journal of Case Reports. 2016; 17: 398
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

  Site Map | What's new | Copyright and Disclaimer
  Online since 1st April '07
  © 2007 - Indian Journal of Cancer | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow