Indian Journal of Cancer
Home  ICS  Feedback Subscribe Top cited articles Login 
Users Online :857
Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Navigate Here
 »   Next article
 »   Previous article
 »   Table of Contents

Resource Links
 »   Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
 »   Citation Manager
 »   Access Statistics
 »   Reader Comments
 »   Email Alert *
 »   Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3869    
    Printed130    
    Emailed3    
    PDF Downloaded9652    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal

 

 ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 50  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 285-291

A Phase 3, randomized, double-blind study of single-dose fosaprepitant for prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting: Results of an Indian population subanalysis


1 Medical Oncology, SEAROC Cancer Center, S.K. Soni Hospital Premise, Jaipur, India
2 Lakeshore Hospital and Research Centre Ltd, Kerala, India
3 Hemato-Oncology Clinic, Ahemdabad Pvt. Ltd, Vedanta Institute of Medical Sciences, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
4 Apollo, Speciality Hospital, Chennai, Tamil nadu, India
5 Merck Research Laboratories, Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp, Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA

Correspondence Address:
A Maru
Medical Oncology, SEAROC Cancer Center, S.K. Soni Hospital Premise, Jaipur
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-509X.123580

Clinical trial registration NCT00619359

Rights and Permissions

Context: Currently, there is limited data on the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in Indian patients. Aims: This post hoc study assessed the efficacy and safety of fosaprepitant compared with aprepitant for prevention of CINV in the Indian population. A subgroup analysis was performed from data collected in a phase 3 study of intravenous (IV) fosaprepitant or oral aprepitant, plus the 5-HT 3 antagonist ondansetron and the corticosteroid dexamethasone, in cisplatin-naοve patients with solid malignancies. Materials and Methods: Patients scheduled to receive cisplatin (≥70 mg/m 2 ) were administered a single IV dose of fosaprepitant dimeglumine (150 mg) on day 1 or a 3-day dosing regimen of oral aprepitant (day 1:125 mg, days 2 and 3:80 mg) with standard doses of ondansetron and dexamethasone. Patients recorded nausea and/or vomiting episodes and their use of rescue medication and were monitored for adverse events (AEs) and tolerability. Statistical Analysis Used: Differences in response rates between fosaprepitant and aprepitant were calculated using the Miettinen and Nurminen method. Results: In the Indian subpopulation (n = 372), efficacy was similar for patients in both the fosaprepitant or aprepitant groups; complete response in the overall, acute, and delayed phases and no vomiting in all phases were approximately 4 percentage points higher in the fosaprepitant group compared with the aprepitant group. Fosaprepitant was generally well-tolerated; common AEs were similar to oral aprepitant. Conclusions: IV fosaprepitant is as safe and effective as oral aprepitant in the Indian subpopulation and offers an alternative to the oral formulation.






[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*


        
Print this article     Email this article

  Site Map | What's new | Copyright and Disclaimer
  Online since 1st April '07
  © 2007 - Indian Journal of Cancer | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow