Indian Journal of Cancer
Home  ICS  Feedback Subscribe Top cited articles Login 
Users Online :527
Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Navigate here
  Search
 
  
Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
   Article in PDF (1,969 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   References
   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1239    
    Printed23    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded164    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
  Table of Contents  
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 52  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 405-407
 

Rehabilitative management of segmental mandibulectomy patient


1 Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication18-Feb-2016

Correspondence Address:
A Singh
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-509X.176703

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Vivek R, Singh A, Chaturvedi T P. Rehabilitative management of segmental mandibulectomy patient. Indian J Cancer 2015;52:405-7

How to cite this URL:
Vivek R, Singh A, Chaturvedi T P. Rehabilitative management of segmental mandibulectomy patient. Indian J Cancer [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Jun 16];52:405-7. Available from: http://www.indianjcancer.com/text.asp?2015/52/3/405/176703


Sir,

Ameloblastoma are benign epithelial neoplasms and representing about 10% of odontogenic tumors. These neoplasms develop from various sources of odontogenic epithelium, including dental follicular lining, epithelial lining and exhibit locally aggressive behavior.[1] Approximately, 50% of ameloblastoma arise from epithelial lining of the dentigerous cyst and are called mural ameloblastoma. Treatment of ameloblastoma depends on the extent of tumor infiltration through the cyst wall and into the surrounding bone. Aggressive resection has been advocated for management of ameloblastoma of the maxillofacial region.

A 28-year-old male patient reported with the chief complaint of swelling in left posterior region of the lower jaw since 2 months. Dental history indicated gradual increase in swelling size with occasional pain. On extra oral examination, paresthesia of the lower lip, facial asymmetry, diffuse swelling on left angle and body of mandible was found. Swelling was non-tender, soft to hard in consistency, no rise in local temperature and lymph nodes were non-palpable. Intraoral examination revealed expansion of the cortical plate in the region of 35, 36, 37 [Figure 1]. Grade III mobility in relation to 35, 36 and grade II with respect to 37 were other findings recorded. On radiographic examination, computed tomography scan, axial view confirmed expansion of buccal and lingual cortical plate [Figure 2]. Treatment was initiated with extraction of 35 and 36 and incisional biopsy of tissue was obtained from the socket of 36. The lesion was diagnosed as mural ameloblastoma of the mandible extending from apices of 33 to distal of 38. Surgical treatment plan included segmental mandibulectomy followed by reconstruction with iliac crest bone graft.
Figure 1: Intraoral view

Click here to view
Figure 2: Computed tomography scan (axial view)

Click here to view


Surgery was completed with resection of the affected segment of the jaw [Figure 3] followed by the placement of the iliac crest graft fixed with titanium reconstruction plate. Tumor-free margins were confirmed by pathological studies; therefore follow-up radiation therapy was not indicated. Post-surgical healing was uneventful and 6 month follow-up was done. After complete healing, patient was recalled and thorough pre-prosthetic intraoral [Figure 4] and radiographic assessment was done and conventional cast partial denture was planned due to patient's financial restriction for implant therapy [Figure 5]. Intraoral examination revealed thick, freely movable soft-tissues with scar formation, loss of the alveolar ridge and obliteration of buccal and lingual sulci in the segmented half of the mandibular region.
Figure 3: Resected section of mandible

Click here to view
Figure 4: Post-operative (pre-prosthetic) intraoral view

Click here to view
Figure 5: Post-operative osteoprotegerin

Click here to view


Prosthetic phase of the patient was initiated by making impressions of upper and lower arch using irreversible hydrocolloid [Figure 6] (Neocolloid, Zhermach, Rovigo, Italy). Cast was poured in dental stone (Kalstone; Kalabhai Karson Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India). Surveying and designing was done and required mouth preparations were completed. Final impression (Reprosil, Dentsply/Caulk, Milford, DE) [Figure 7] and cast duplication (Begoform, Bego, Germany) were carried out followed by designing with pattern wax on the master cast. Casting of the metal framework was done in co-cr alloy (CoCr Model Casting Alloy; Degussa Dental, Hanau, Germany). After finishing of the framework, intraoral try-in was done and minor adjustments were made [Figure 8]. Later, jaw relation followed by teeth setting on the affected side was completed. When the partial denture try-in appointment was satisfactory [Figure 9], packing and curing of the denture was done in the conventional manner. After required finishing and polishing, intraoral placement of cast partial denture was done [Figure 10]. The cast partial denture was delivered and post-insertion instructions were given. Patient was recalled after 24 h for minor adjustments. Follow-up at regular interval of 2 months for initial 1 year was done.
Figure 6: Maxillary and mandibular primary impression

Click here to view
Figure 7: Mandibular final impression with putty and light-body

Click here to view
Figure 8: Framework tryin-occlusal view

Click here to view
Figure 9: Cast partial denture try-in

Click here to view
Figure 10: Occlusal view of prosthesis

Click here to view


Ameloblastoma in the mandible can progress to great size and cause facial asymmetry, displacement of teeth, loose teeth, malocclusion and pathologic fractures. Even though some authors advocate a more conservative approach such as enucleation and curettage of this tumor, a large lesion with erosion of the mandibular cortex certainly requires a more aggressive approach for complete removal of the tumor.[2] Four donor sites i.e., fibula, iliac crest, radial forearm and scapula have become the primary sources of vascularized bone and soft-tissue for the oral reconstruction.[2] Type III resection [3] produces a defect to the midline or farther towards the intact side, leaving half or less of the mandible remaining. An implant-supported fixed prosthesis or removable cast partial dentures are the two main treatment options to restore partially edentulous arches in patients who had undergone mandibular resection. The present case was challenging due to patient's unwillingness for surgical intervention with implant placement, due to financial constraints. To achieve denture stability proper border extensions and impression surface, polished denture surface contours and harmonious occlusion were developed. The forces developed through muscular contraction during mastication, speaking and swallowing are directed against the dentures, which either helps to stabilize or dislodge them. Patient was instructed to masticate only on the non-resected side to avoid denture instability. Changes in tissues beneath a maxillofacial prosthesis may be more rapid than those beneath conventional complete denture prosthesis; therefore, the occlusion and base adaptation were revaluated frequently.[4]

 
  References Top

1.
Goaz PW, White SC. Oral Radiology; Principles and Interpretation. 3rd ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1994. p. 398-676.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Kahairi A, Ahmad RL, Wan Islah L, Norra H. Management of large mandibular ameloblastoma – A case report and literature reviews. Arch Orofac Sci 2008;3:52-5.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Cantor R, Curtis TA. Prosthetic management of edentulous mandibulectomy patients. I. Anatomic, physiologic, and psychologic considerations. J Prosthet Dent 1971;25:446-57.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Principles, concepts, and practices in prosthodontics – 1994. Academy of Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:73-94.  Back to cited text no. 4
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

  Site Map | What's new | Copyright and Disclaimer
  Online since 1st April '07
  2007 - Indian Journal of Cancer | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow