Indian Journal of Cancer
Home  ICS  Feedback Subscribe Top cited articles Login 
Users Online :596
Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Navigate Here
 »   Next article
 »   Previous article
 »   Table of Contents

Resource Links
 »   Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
 »   Citation Manager
 »   Access Statistics
 »   Reader Comments
 »   Email Alert *
 »   Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed174    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded53    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 

 REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 54  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 9-14

Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing: From conventional to real-time diagnosis of lung cancer


1 Department of Medical Oncology, Apollo Speciality Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
2 MVR Cancer Centre and Research Institute, Kozhikode, Kerala, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. T Raja
Department of Medical Oncology, Apollo Speciality Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_507_17

Rights and Permissions

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) commonly harbor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. Due to the complex disease pathology, early-stage diagnosis of patients with EGFR mutation is essential to make appropriate treatment decision. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are commonly used for their treatment, but almost half of the patients with EGFR mutation do not respond to the available TKIs and develop acquired resistance owing to T790M mutation. The presence of T790M mutation also warrants a robust diagnostic method so as to allow clinicians to modify cancer treatment. Numerous diagnostic techniques for the detection of EGFR mutation, however, their performance and working profile variation necessitate a comparative evaluation for the selection of a better diagnostic method or an advanced combination of theirs. The present review compares various EGFR-mutation detection techniques such as Sanger sequencing, next-generation sequencing, and different polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods. It also highlights the role of advanced PCR-based techniques, i.e., real-time or quantitative PCR and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) for detecting EGFR mutations in NSCLC patients. ddPCR, when compared to other methods, shows enhanced sensitivity, superior reliability, and improved time and cost-effectiveness. Moreover, its ability to detect EGFR mutations including T790M, in both conventional (solid tissue biopsy samples) and nonconventional sample sources (blood, plasma, and urine samples), gives it an edge over other diagnostic techniques and support its integration in clinical practice setting.






[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*


        
Print this article     Email this article

  Site Map | What's new | Copyright and Disclaimer
  Online since 1st April '07
  © 2007 - Indian Journal of Cancer | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow