Indian Journal of Cancer
Home  ICS  Feedback Subscribe Top cited articles Login 
Users Online :440
Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Navigate here
  Search
 
  
Resource links
 »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
 »  Article in PDF (325 KB)
 »  Citation Manager
 »  Access Statistics
 »  Reader Comments
 »  Email Alert *
 »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
 »  Abstract
 » Introduction
 »  Materials and Me...
 » Results
 » Discussion
 » Conclusion
 »  References
 »  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed374    
    Printed29    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded56    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
  Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 55  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 404-409
 

Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions among smokeless tobacco usage: A cross-sectional study


1 Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, SDM College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Sattur, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, SDM College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Sattur, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
3 Department of Community, SDM College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Sattur, Dharwad, Karnataka, India

Date of Web Publication28-Feb-2019

Correspondence Address:
Kaveri Hallikeri
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, SDM College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Sattur, Dharwad, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_178_18

Rights and Permissions

 » Abstract 


BACKGROUND: Tobacco use is one of the most prevalent forms of habit and associated with development of potential malignant disorders. The aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence and distribution of oral mucosal lesions (OMLs) among smokeless tobacco users. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a hospital-based cross-sectional study. All the patients with the history of smokeless tobacco habit were included in the study. The patients were interviewed using the preformed questionnaire, including the patient's demographic details, the type of habit, duration, frequency, and the associated oral mucosal pathology. Further, patients were clinically examined and recorded on tobacco-related oral lesions. RESULTS: Prevalence of OML was 54.18%, and 91.50% being among male and with higher frequency at the age of second and fourth decade. The prevalence of oral submucous fibrosis, leukoplakia, carcinoma, lichen planus, and erythroplakia was 26.95, 10.35, 9.94, 5.5, and 0.66%, respectively. Smokeless tobacco habit was prevailing among males (98.79%) compared to females (9.37%). Frequency of habit-associated OML was statistically significant with odds ratio 0.24. CONCLUSION: The study proves a definite association between smokeless tobacco habit and OML. The data necessitate to correlate and follow up the individuals with smokeless form of tobacco habits to establish the definite correlation between the habit and oral mucosal lesions.


Keywords: Leukoplakia, mucosal lesion, oral submucous fibrosis, smokeless tobacco


How to cite this article:
Hallikeri K, Naikmasur V, Guttal K, Shodan M, Chennappa NK. Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions among smokeless tobacco usage: A cross-sectional study. Indian J Cancer 2018;55:404-9

How to cite this URL:
Hallikeri K, Naikmasur V, Guttal K, Shodan M, Chennappa NK. Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions among smokeless tobacco usage: A cross-sectional study. Indian J Cancer [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 May 21];55:404-9. Available from: http://www.indianjcancer.com/text.asp?2018/55/4/404/253282





 » Introduction Top


In India, tobacco consumption is responsible for half of all the cancers in men and one-fourth of cancers in women. The World Health Organization predicts that tobacco deaths in India may exceed 1.5 million annually by 2020.[1] Tobacco use in India differs from the globe. The documented form of tobacco used globally is the cigarette; however, in India, only 20% of tobacco is consumed as cigarette, 40% is consumed as bidi, and rest in the form of smokeless tobacco.[2] Tobacco usage is influenced by various factors such as individual attitude, stress, workload, availability, advertising campaigns, etc.

In India, the practice of tobacco consumption varies from one state to another state and within each state. Therefore, it is important to gather information about the prevalence of tobacco habit among the local population. This helps to assess the epidemiological and behavioral patterns among the habitual users. Also, this information would help to develop and implement relevant tobacco intervention strategies, as dentists often come across patients with tobacco habits, when compared to the medical practitioner. The incidence of potentially malignant diseases of the oral cavity is increasing and also showing predilection in younger age group due to increase in intake of smokeless form of tobacco.[3] Tobacco has been identified as initiation and progression of oral cancer. To reduce the mortality and morbidity of disease, it is important to screen all the patients with the history of tobacco habit, and early screening plays a vital role for early intervention and prevention of oral cancer. Tobacco cessation and education regarding the hazardous effects of tobacco is an essential component for reducing mortality and morbidity related to its use.[4] However, considerable research is required to comprehend the actual trends and reliable prevalence data on tobacco consumption are scarce. Cross-sectional studies are important in estimating the prevalence of a disease in the population and identifying high-risk populations. There is inadequate data regarding the smokeless tobacco use among the population in Dharwad of North Karnataka. The objectives of this study were to investigate the prevalence and distribution of oral mucosal lesions (OMLs) among smokeless tobacco users and to establish the clinical varieties of precancer and oral cancer associated with smokeless tobacco habits.


 » Materials and Methods Top


Study population

A cross-sectional study was conducted at the SDM College of Dental Sciences, Dharwad to assess the relationship between tobacco-related habits and associated oral lesions. All patients reporting to the outpatient section of Department of Oral Medicine having history of chewing form of tobacco-related habit, areca nut, and/or betel quid for a minimum 5 years were included in the study. Patients who were unwilling to give complete habit details and smoking and mixed form of habits were excluded. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB no. 2012/P/OP/15) and the study was carried out for 1-year duration.

Screening program

The predesigned questionnaire was used to record the data. The standardized questionnaire included patient's demographic details such as age, sex, educational status, occupation details of type of habit such as betel quid, pan masala with tobacco, gutkha, tobacco paste and combination, duration, and frequency of habit. Further habit-associated OMLs were recorded.

Screening was done by two trained faculty. Before screening, all the patients were explained about the habits and its association with oral mucosal lesions and informed consent was obtained. Random sampling collection was done. This was followed by detailed recording of habits and examination was done by the same researchers for the presence of any oral lesions. Clinical examination was done using mouth mirrors under adequate illumination. If a lesion was clinically judged as suspicious for malignancy, punch biopsy was performed.

Statistical analysis

The data collected were tabulated in Microsoft Excel. Proportion analysis was done to know the percentage of distribution among the variables. Chi-square test was used to establish the statistical difference between the different variables, and significance was assessed at 5% level. Odds ratio at 95% confidence interval was used to evaluate the risk associated with tobacco habit.


 » Results Top


Of the 2455 study population, 2280 (92.87%) males and 175 (7.12%) females had smokeless tobacco habit. [Table 1]a and [Table 1]b describe the detailed distribution of the subjects by basic characteristics and sociodemographic features. The findings show that the habitual users belonged to low or average socioeconomic status.


Click here to view


[Table 1]a depicts distribution of age group among habitual users. The habit was highly prevalent in the age group of 40–49 years and mean age was 45 years among males and in females the mean age was slightly older than the males, i.e., 53 years. The statistically significant difference was observed among the males and females and the age groups.

The educational status was higher among the males compared to females. Statistically significant difference was noted between education and gender [Table 1]b. Occupational relation with tobacco usage reveals that highest prevalence among drivers, tailors, army, tea sellers, cleaners, and maids, followed by laborers, landowners, shopkeeper/vendor, homemakers, students technical/professionals, teachers, and unemployed. The difference of rates of tobacco use with regard to the gender and occupation is statistically significant (P = 0.00001) [Table 1]c.

Prevalence of the type of habit

Overall prevalence of smokeless form of tobacco in males was 90.37% and in females was 9.62%. The most common form of tobacco consumption in males was use of betel quid (58.06%). Following betel quid, gutkha is a commercially available processed areca nut product with tobacco that was practiced commonly in 31.95%; combination, i.e., more than one type of habit, which includes more commonly betel quid and gutaka was 4.86% and pan masala with tobacco was 2.92%. The least practiced habit was tobacco paste (1.88%), khaini (0.18%), and other forms (0.12%) such as tobacco in the form of powder.

Similar habit patterns was evident among females (n = 175). The various forms of smokeless tobacco used among both sexes showed statistically significant difference [Table 2].
Table 2: Distribution of types of smokeless tobacco habits among the study subjects

Click here to view


Prevalence of OMLs

The study revealed that 54.17% had developed the OMLs in tobacco habitual among both the sexes. Lesions were highly prevalent among males (92.87%) as compared to females (7.12%); these findings well correlate with the habit practiced among them. The difference in the occurrence of OMLs among sex is statistically significant (χ2 = 8.20, P = 0.0042) [Table 3].
Table 3: Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions by sex

Click here to view


In the different age groups, the OMLs were prevalent at the age of 40–49 years (19.85%) and least at the age of ≤20 years (2.93%). A difference in prevalence of OMLs in different age groups did not show statistical significance [Table 4].
Table 4: Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions by age groups

Click here to view


Distribution of OMLs among males and females irrespective of the form of habit and prevalence noted in males was 91.50%, and females 8.49%. The highly prevalent lesion among males was oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) (26.95%), followed by leukoplakia (10.35%), carcinoma (9.94%), lichen planus (5.5%), and erythroplakia (0.66%). The other lesions noted were pan encrustations and hyperkeratosis. More than one lesion was observed only in 3.78% male subjects. Candidiasis was recorded only in 1.23% subjects. In females, the OMLs carcinoma was highly prevalent (28.31%) followed by lichen planus (12.38%), OSF (12.38%), leukoplakia and erythroplakia, pan encrustation, hyperkeratosis, candidiasis, and combination of lesions were 3.5%. A difference in prevalence of OMLs in male and female was found to be statistically significant [Table 5].
Table 5: Prevalence of types oral mucosal lesions in the study subjects by sex

Click here to view


The occurrence of OMLs with frequency and duration of habit was assessed. The different frequency of smokeless tobacco and occurrence of OMLs were not statistically significant [Table 6]. But, duration of habit and the occurrence of OMLs revealed statistically significant correlation. Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) was seen associated with longer duration of habit, whereas the occurrence of potential malignant disorders (PMDs) such as OSF and lichen planus was seen at shorter duration [Table 7], while the other lesions such as erythroplakia, candidiasis, pan encrustation, and hyperkeratosis showed arbitrary distribution with the duration of smokeless form of tobacco habit.
Table 6: Relationship between frequency of smokeless tobacco habit and oral mucosal lesions

Click here to view
Table 7: Relationship between duration of smokeless tobacco habits and oral mucosal lesions

Click here to view


Odds of occurrence of OMLs is 0.218 with frequency of more than 15 times use of smokeless tobacco as compared to reference category. It explains that the smokeless tobacco with the duration more than 15 times have 0.218 times more chances of OMLs as compared with other frequency. The findings were statistically significant [Table 8].
Table 8: Association between frequency of smokeless tobacco habit and occurrence of mucosal lesions

Click here to view


Less duration (1–5 years) of smokeless tobacco habit has got strong association with OMLs with odds ratio = 0.239 as compared to the other duration of smokeless habit [Table 9].
Table 9: Association between duration of smokeless tobacco habit and occurrence of mucosal lesions

Click here to view



 » Discussion Top


Tobacco consumption in multiple forms is an emerging, significant, and growing threat to health. More than 7000 different chemicals have been found in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Among these more than 60 are considered as carcinogenic. Smokeless form of tobacco is practiced more commonly than smoking tobacco in India. Among the smokeless form, commercially available sachets are becoming common, especially among teenagers and young adults than in the older age group. A definite association has been recorded between tobacco habit and OMLs such as PMD and oral cancer.[5]

We studied parameters such as income, education, occupation, age, and gender of patients that give more meaningful information regarding the prevalence of this deleterious habit. The prevalence of adverse effect of oral habit was found to be much higher in males as compared to females. Illiterate or less education shows the lack of awareness of harmful effects of consumption of tobacco products.[3] As income was low, they tend to compromise on healthy and nutritious diet and these group of people will be more prone for developing mucosal lesions. As men with occupations such as laborer, daily wagers, tea seller, shopkeepers, etc., need substantial amount of energy to do work, they tend to chew tobacco, in addition to social and peer pressure among the youngsters being noted. This usage contributes to their work environment, to kill the hunger and to get instant soothing effect of tobacco which is common. Similar findings have been recorded by Choudary et al. and Keluskar and Kale.[6],[7]

In addition, prevalence of oral habit was found to be much higher in males as compared to females in this study and similar findings are reported by other authors. Moreover, the habit was highly prevalent at the earlier age group among the males than females, probably due to practice of habit at an earlier age. These findings are similar to the earlier studies reported by Mehrotra et al., Shivakumar et al., Zain and Saraswathi et al., Jaber et al., Prashant et al.[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13] Prevalence of oral habit in India reported by various authors in different geographical areas is as follows: at Chennai region 6.99%, Belgaum region 21.8%, Allahabad 21%, and Bangalore region 7.53%.[7],[8],[9],[11]

Use of betel quid was prevalent among both males and females, followed by gutkha. Betel quid is composed of pan, tobacco, slaked lime, betel nut, and other additives, whereas gutkha comprises betel nut and tobacco. In addition to tobacco, betel nut is also been considered as carcinogen by IARC.[14]

Betel nut is mainly used in the form of gutkha and pan masala. Usage of these products is one of the major causes for the development of OMLs, particularly OSF. Habitual gutkha users have been found to be present with OSF at earlier ages compared with traditional betel quid users. A gutkha sachet weighs ~3.5 g and contains 7% moisture, whereas the net weight of a betel quid is nearly 4 g (with ~1.14 g of tobacco) and contains 70% moisture. Because gutkha users tend to consume more dry weight of tobacco, areca nut, and slaked lime, they may be exposed to OSF at earlier ages compared to other types of betel quid users.[14],[15]

Among the alternative is tobacco users 54.17% had developed OMLs and lesions were highly prevalent among males than females. Similarly, higher prevalence was noted between 41.2 and 66.2% range. However, Shulman et al., Shivakumar et al., and Puneet et al. reported the frequency of OMLs at 10.26, 11.33, and 16.8%,[9],[16],[17] whereas Mobeeriek et al. noted the prevalence of OMLs higher in females than males and Corbert et al. did not find any difference between males and females.[18],[19] This variation could be attributed to number of tobacco habituals recorded whether they are male or female individuals. Generally habit is common among males compared with females, and other reasons could be access to tobacco products, cultural constrains, etc.

Prevalence of OMLs between both sexes observed were PMDs such as OSF, leukoplakia, lichen planus, erythroplakia, and OSCC 26.9, 10.35, 5.5, 0.66, and 9.94%, respectively, in males. Other mucosal changes such as pan encrustation hyperkeratosis were also recorded. Bhatnagar et al. conducted a study in Modinagar, UP and recorded that OML includes leukoplakia (2.83%), lichen planus (0.8%), OSF (1.97%) and Sudhakar et al. in Eluru, AP, India, noted tobacco-induced lesions comprised smokers melanosis (3.49%), leukoplakia (2.04%), smokers palate (1.18%), OSF (0.7%), smokers keratosis (0.49%), tobacco pouch keratosis (0.16%), malignancy (0.16%), and chewers mucosa (0.13%).[17],[20]

Roy and Varshney in Dehradun, North India reported that out of their 35 OPL patients, 4 (11.4%) had leukoplakia, 12 (34.2%) had oral lichen planus, 6 (17.1%) had OSMF, and 13 (37%) had discoid lupus erythematosus.[21] In another Indian study by Ranganathan et al., oral soft tissue lesions were found in 4.1% of the study subjects from Chennai, South India. The prevalence of leukoplakia, OSF, and oral lichen planus was 0.59, 0.55, and 0.15%, respectively.[22] Keluskar et al. recorded in Belgaum, Karnataka region the prevalence of lesion, highest being OSF 28.5%, leukoplakia 13.4%, and cancer 6.3%.[7] Sujatha et al. noted in Bangalore the prevalence of mucosal lesions as follows: leukoplakia 14%, OSF 8.2%, lichen planus 0.8%, and malignancy 0.8%.[23]

In a study by Holmstrup et al. (2006a), a total of 269 lesions in 236 patients were included; 39 lesions (41%) being homogenous and 46 (49%) nonhomogenous leukoplakia whereas nine (5%) were erythroplakia. 73% of the lesions were associated with tobacco habits. 71% of the lesions showed a degree of epithelial dysplasia. Nonhomogenous leukoplakia accounted for highest frequency of malignant development, i.e. 20%, whereas 3% of the homogenous leukoplakia developed carcinomas.[24] Prasad et al. noted the most prevalent lesions were lichen planus (2.02%), leukoplakia (1.73%), ulceration (0.73%), candidiasis (0.94%), and abscess (1.05%).[25]

We did not record the developmental anomalies as these are not associated with tobacco. Various authors have noted oral developmental lesions such as Fordyce's granules, fissured tongue, leukoedema, and hairy tongue.[18],[23],[26]

The relationship between the frequency and duration of the habit and OMLs was assessed. Frequency and duration of habit is known to influence the occurrence of OMLs, but in the present study frequency of habit with mucosal lesions did not show any statistical significant difference.

The premalignant and malignant lesions, i.e., leukoplakia and carcinoma had developed with the longer duration of habit, i.e., 21 years. OSF is a highly prevalent disease among premalignancy, associated with shorter duration of habit. In contrast, leukoplakia and carcinoma were seen in longer period of usage of smokeless tobacco and the habit of smoking tobacco. In addition, other mucosal changes such as pan encrustation and hyperkeratosis were seen more in number with increased duration habit. Sujatha et al. and Aruna et al. found a significant correlation between frequency and duration of habit on the development of OMLs. They also noted the patients with habit of 5–10 times/day had maximum number of lesions.[3],[23] The changing patterns in the prevalence of habit and OMLs at the younger population are at risk of developing malignancy at the third and fourth decade of life. In the present study, OSF was the highly prevalent oral lesion. In a cohort study of 994 cases, 37 (3.72%) OSF transformed into malignancy with an average duration of 37.42 months.[26] Epidemiologic studies have shown that the rate of malignant transformation ranges from 3 to 19%.[27],[28],[29] Furthermore, more than 2400 new cases of OSCC arising from OSF have been diagnosed each year in Taiwan due to the prevalent use of betel quid.[30]

The National Cancer Control Programme [31] in India was formulated in 1984 with four major goals that include: (1) primary prevention of tobacco-related cancers, (2) early detection of cancers of easily accessible sites, (3) augmentation of treatment facilities, and (4) establishment of equitable, pain control, and palliative care network throughout the country.

Preventive measures should start at grass root levels aimed at individuals who are at high risk for tobacco usage along with intervention at a community level and policy interventions by the policymakers. Health professionals including dentists should also play an active role in prevention and control of tobacco-induced lesions by direct contact with patients who are at increased risk. In India, under the district cancer control program, the paramedical staffs of primary health center have been trained to conduct oral examination for early detection and for providing health education.[32]

Screening and early detection in populations at risk are mandatory to decrease morbidity and mortality of oral cancer. Visual oral examination is an effective screening method, with varying sensitivity and specificity rates. Because the initial presentations of oral cancer and precancer are often subtle and rarely demonstrate the clinical characteristics compared to advanced cases,[33] additional screening aids are needed that can be employed along with oral visual examination to improve the sensitivity or specificity of oral screening beyond conventional oral examination alone.[34] These diagnostic tests include toluidine blue staining, brush cytology, tissue reflectance (Vizilite plus, Microlux DL), narrow emission tissue fluorescence which are light-based detection systems, and use of tumor markers for early diagnosis.


 » Conclusion Top


The study establishes the prevalence of OMLs in patients attending the institution. The study data can serve as a useful tool in educating the patients with deleterious habit of chewing form of tobacco. A regular and frequent examination of oral cavity is emphasized among the tobacco habituals. Further studies in the general population need to be performed, which would also help to prevent and plan the regional oral health programs, as the present data highlight the high usage of tobacco among community and its definite association with OMLs. OSF is an emerging disease among the youngsters, which needs immediate consideration.

Financial support and sponsorship

ICMR, Delhi, India. Reference number: 5/4/2-9 NCD-II

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
 » References Top

1.
Mathers CD, Loncar D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med 2006;3:e442.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Sinha DN, Gupta PC, Pednekar MS. Tobacco use in a rural area of Bihar, India. Indian J Community Med 2003;XXVIII: 167-70.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Aruna DS, Prasad KV, Shavi GR, Ariga J, Rajesh G, Krishna M. Retrospective study on risk habits among oral cancer patients in Karnataka Cancer Therapy Research Institute, Hubli, India. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev 2011;12:1561-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Johnson NW, Bain CA, and Co-authors of the EU Working Group on Tobacco and Oral Health. Tobacco and oral disease. Br Dent J 2000;189:200-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Sridharan G. Epidemiology, control and control and prevention of tobacco induced oral mucosal lesions in India. Indian J Cancer 2014;51:130-5.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Choudary K. Tobacco control in India. In 50 years of cancer control in India, Director General Health Services. New Delhi: Government of India; 2001 pp. 196-211.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Keluskar V, Kale A. An epidemiological study for evaluation of oral precancerous lesions, conditions and oral cancer among Belgaum population with tobacco habit. Biosci Biotech Res Comm 2010;3:50-4.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Mehrotra R, Thomas S, Nair P, Pandya S, Singh M, Nigam M. Prevalence of oral soft tissue lesions in Vidhisha. BMC Res Notes 2010;3:23.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Shivakumar GC, Sahana S, Saha S. Prevalence and site distribution of oral mucosal lesions in patients attending outpatient clinics of Oxford Dental College, Bangalore. J Indian Assoc Public Health Dent 2010;15:69-73.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Zain RB, Ikeda N, Gupta PC, Warnakulasuriya S, van Wyk CW, Shrestha P, et al. Oral mucosal lesions associated with betel quid, areca nut and tobacco chewing habits: consensus from a workshop held in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. J Oral Pathol Med 1996;28:1-4.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Saraswathi TR, Ranganathan K, Shanmugam S, Sowmya R, Narasimhan PD, Gunaseelan R. Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in relation to habits: Cross sectional study in South India. Ind J Dent Res 2006;17:121-5.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Jaber MA, Porter SR, Gilthorpe et al. Risk factors for oral epithelial dysplasia the role of smoking and alcohol. Oral Oncol 1999;35:151-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Patil PB, Bathi R, Chaudhari S. Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in dental patients with tobacco smoking, chewing, and mixed habits: A cross sectional study in South India. J Family Comm Med 2013;20:130-5.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Jeng JH, Chang MC, Hahn LJ. Role of areca nut in betel quid associated chemical carcinogenesis: current awareness and future perspectives. Oral Oncol 2001;37:477-92.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Javed F, Chotai M, Mehmood A, Almas K. Oral mucosal disorders associated with habitual gutka usage: A review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:857-64.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Shulman DJ, Beach MM, Rivera-Hidalgo F. The prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in U.S. adults. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:1279-86.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Bhatnagar P, Rai S, Prabhat M. Prevalence study of oral mucosal lesions, mucosal variants, and treatment required for patients reporting to a dental school in North India: In accordance with WHO guidelines. J Family Comm Med 2013;20:41-8.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Al-Mobeeriek A, AlDosari AM. Prevalence of oral lesions among Saudi dental patients. Ann Saudi Med 2009;29:365-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
19.
Corbet EF, Holmgren CJ, Philipsen HP. Oral mucosal lesions in 65-74 year old Hong Kong Chinese. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994;22:392-5.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Sudhakar S, Praveen Kumar B, Prabhat MP. Prevalence of oral mucosal changes in Eluru,. Andhra Pradesh (India) - An institutional study. J Oral Health Comm Dent 2011;5:42-6.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Roy S, Varshney S. Oral dermatological conditions: A clinical study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;65:97-101.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Ranganathan K, Devi MU, Joshua E, Kirankumar K, Saraswathi TR. Oral submucous fibrosis: A case-control study in Chennai, South India. J Oral Pathol Med 2004;33:274-7.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Sujatha D, Hebbar PB, Pai A. Prevalence and correlation of oral lesions among tobacco smokers, tobacco chewers, areca nut and alcohol users. Asian Pacific J Cancer 2012;13:1633-7.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Holmstrup P, Vedtofte P, Reibel J, Stoltze K. Long-term treatment outcome of oral premalignant lesions. Oral Oncol 2006;42:461-74.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Prasad KV, Javali SB, Rajesh G, Jithendra A. An epidemiological study of oral mucosal lesions in Karnataka state. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 2004;16:9-18.  Back to cited text no. 25
  [Full text]  
26.
Jahanbani J, Sandvik L, Lyberg T, Ahlfors E. Evaluation of oral mucosal lesions in 598 referred Iranian patients. Open Dent J 2009;3:42-7.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Wang YY, Tail YH, Wang WC, Chen CY, Kao YH, Chen YK, et al. Malignant transformation in 5071 southern Taiwanese patients with potentially malignant oral mucosal disorders. BMC Oral Health 2014;14:99.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Ekanayaka RP, Tilakaratne WM. Oral submucous fibrosis: Review on mechanisms of pathogenesis and malignant transformation. J Carcinogene Mutagene 2013;S5:002.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Murti PR, Bhonsle RB, Pindborg JJ, Daftary DK, Gupta PC, Mehta FS. Malignant transformation rate in oral submucous fibrosis over a 17-year period. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1985;13:340-1.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Pindborg JJ, Sirsat SM. Oral submucous fibrosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1966; 22:764-79.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Dinsaw KA, Shastri SS, Patil SS. Cancer control programme in India: Challenges for the millennium. Health Administrator 2004;17:10-3.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Mathew B, Shankarnarayanan R, Sunilkamar KB, Kuruvila B, Pisani P, Nair MK. Reproducibility and validity of oral visual inspection by trained health workers in detection oral precancer and cancer. Br J Cancer 1997;76:390-4.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Mashberg A, Feldman LJ. Clinical criteria for identifying early oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma; Erythroplakia revisited. Am J Surg 1988;156:273-5.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Lingen MW, Kalmar JR, Karrison T, Speight PM. Critical evaluation of diagnostic aids for the detection oral cancer. Oral Oncol 2008;44:10-22.  Back to cited text no. 34
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7], [Table 8], [Table 9]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

  Site Map | What's new | Copyright and Disclaimer
  Online since 1st April '07
  © 2007 - Indian Journal of Cancer | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow