Indian Journal of Cancer
Home  ICS  Feedback Subscribe Top cited articles Login 
Users Online :2500
Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Navigate here
  Search
 
  
Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
   Article in PDF (254 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1288    
    Printed58    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded120    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 

  Table of Contents  
EDITORIAL
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 57  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 121-122
 

Pulmonary metastasectomy in osteosarcoma: Finite disappointments to keep alive the infinite hope!


1 Department of Medical Oncology, State Cancer Center, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (IGIMS) Patna, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission28-Dec-2018
Date of Decision22-Nov-2019
Date of Acceptance13-Dec-2019
Date of Web Publication17-May-2020

Correspondence Address:
Jyoti Bajpai
Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_842_18

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Pande A, Bajpai J. Pulmonary metastasectomy in osteosarcoma: Finite disappointments to keep alive the infinite hope!. Indian J Cancer 2020;57:121-2

How to cite this URL:
Pande A, Bajpai J. Pulmonary metastasectomy in osteosarcoma: Finite disappointments to keep alive the infinite hope!. Indian J Cancer [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 28];57:121-2. Available from: http://www.indianjcancer.com/text.asp?2020/57/2/121/284483




Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone malignancy in adolescents. Although multimodality therapy has improved survival of non-metastatic osteosarcomas, it is still associated with gloomy prognosis.[1]

In general, a quarter of patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma present with de-novo metastasis and an additional 30–40% patients develop metastasis at the relapse after adjuvant treatment.[2],[3] Majority (80%) of the synchronous and metachronous metastases are confined to lung and pulmonary metastasectomy is a well-established management approach for these.[2]

Since bone sarcoma patients are young, with relatively preserved organ functions, they can withstand pulmonary metastasectomy in a much better way. There is a fair chance of longer metastasis-free interval and improved life expectancy with this aggressive approach.[2],[3]

As in any rare disease, conducting randomised trials is extremely difficult in metastatic osteosarcomas. There are potential confounders including heterogeneity in nature and volume of pulmonary metastasis, disease free interval, prior systemic therapy compliance and response, surgical expertise and infrastructure limitations.[4],[5] Besides, there is a dearth of high-quality evidence-based guidelines to help clinicians in the decision-making process.

Despite this shortcoming, several retrospective case series and registry data consistently suggest prolonged survival for patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy in osteosarcoma. Thames Registry is one of the largest systematic reviews, wherein 1351 pulmonary metastasectomies were done in specialist thoracic centres and the patients were rigorously followed up for 18 years. It demonstrated impressive five-year survival of 35% after the first metastasectomy with a trend to improved survival with each passing decade.[4] This was attributed to better case selection, aggressive approach, maturing of a learning curve and enhanced surgical skills. Many of these patients had incidentally detected metastasis on surveillance scans which highlights the advantage of picking the metastasis early via enhanced follow-up with computerised tomography (CT) scans of the chest.[4] However, one must remember that CT scans often underestimate the number and extent of lung metastasis. Notably, most of the surgeons performed open thoracotomies with manual palpation and visceral visualisation of metastasis, which increased the yield compared to exclusive video-assisted thoracoscopic approach.

In the current issue of Indian Journal of Cancer, Ramanujan V, et al. present a retrospective case series of 37 osteosarcomas who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy over 15 years.[5] Majority of patients (54%) were relatively good prognostic as they had only single pulmonary metastases. Post-chemotherapy, 77% had a poor response and post metastectomy, 19% of them received second-line chemotherapy with 20% survival at 5 years. The largest published series in India is from Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai wherein 80 patients with metastatic osteosarcomas were treated prospectively with a novel, “OGS-12 ” protocol. This dose-dense protocol comprises of three active drugs (cisplatinum, adriamycin and ifosfamide) and administered in neo (adjuvant) fashion as sequential doublets.[3] The patients who received aggressive multimodality therapy had 27% four-year survival. Interestingly, 25% of patients who were event-free for 30 months had prolonged survival, which emphasised the importance of aggressive multimodality approach in this select subgroup of patients.[3]

There is evidence from the literature that improved outcomes have been demonstrated with multiple revision pulmonary metastasectomies, however, there might also be a selection bias with preferential picking of good biology-disease for repeated surgeries.[4],[6]

Therefore, it is incumbent on treating oncologists to select the patients who have the potential to derive maximum benefit without significant complications that may require prolonged rehabilitation.

Stringent selection criteria including controlled primary disease, potential complete resectability of pulmonary and (limited) extrapulmonary metastases, adequate pulmonary reserve and good performance status of the patient might help in achieving better therapeutic index with best outcomes. The good biology of the disease dominates all across with good histological responders and longer disease-free interval (>1 year) following systemic therapy had the best outcomes.[4],[6],[7]

Aggressive multimodality approach with multiagent chemotherapy, optimal limb surgery and pulmonary metastasectomy is the preferred therapeutic option for osteosarcoma with pulmonary metastasis. Meticulous case selection to look for the important prognostic indicators in this subgroup along with adequate surgical expertise and infrastructure are prerequisites to achieve the best outcomes and possibility of a cure in this select subgroup of the patients. It is thus justified to accept finite disappointments to keep alive the infinite hope!



 
  References Top

1.
Bajpai J, Chandrasekharan A, Talreja V, Simha V, Chandrakanth MV, Rekhi B. Outcomes in non-metastatic treatment naive extremity osteosarcoma patients treated with a novel non-high dosemethotrexate-based, dose-dense combination chemotherapy regimen 'OGS-12. Eur J Cancer 2017;85:49-58.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Aljubran AH, Griffin A, Pintilie M, Blackstein M. Osteosarcoma in adolescents and adults: Survival analysis with and without lung metastases. Ann Oncol 2009;20:1136-41.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Bajpai J, Chandrasekharan A, Simha V, Talreja V, Karpe A, Pandey N, et al. Outcomes in treatment-naïve patients with metastatic extremity osteosarcoma treated with OGS-12, a novel non–high-dose methotrexate–based, dose-dense combination chemotherapy, in a Tertiary care cancer center. J Glob Oncol 2018;4:1-10.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Treasure T, Fiorentino F, Scarci M, Møller H, Utley M. Pulmonary metastasectomy for sarcoma: A systematic review of reported outcomes in the context of Thames cancer registry data. BMJ Open 2012;2:e001736.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Ramanujan V, Krishnamurthy A, Venkataramani K, Kumar C. Pulmonary metastasectomy in primary extremity osteosarcoma: Choosing wisely, along with a brief review of literature. Indian J Cancer 2020;57:172-81.  Back to cited text no. 5
  [Full text]  
6.
Khanna N, Pandey A, Bajpai J. Metastatic Ewing's sarcoma: Revisiting the “Evidence on the fence ”. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2017;38:173.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
7.
Kim S, Ott HC, Wright CD, Wain JC, Morse C, Gaissert HA, et al. Pulmonary resection of metastatic sarcoma: Prognostic factors associated with improved outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;92:1780-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

  Site Map | What's new | Copyright and Disclaimer
  Online since 1st April '07
  2007 - Indian Journal of Cancer | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow