Indian Journal of Cancer Home 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
[View FULLTEXT] [Download PDF]
Year : 2004  |  Volume : 41  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 32--36

Visual inspection for cervical cancer screening; evaluation by doctor versus paramedical worker

Neerja Bhatla1, A Mukhopadhyay1, S Joshi1, A Kumar1, A Kriplani1, RM Pandey2, K Verma3 
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110029, India
2 Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110029, India
3 Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110029, India

Correspondence Address:
Neerja Bhatla
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110029
India

BACKGROUND : In the absence of an effective cervical cancer screening programme, efforts are being made to explore the feasibility of using the existing infrastructure to develop effective low-cost screening methods. AIMS : To evaluate and compare test performance of visual inspection of the cervix by a doctor and a paramedical worker. SETTING AND DESIGN : Gynaecology outpatient department (OPD), All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi; cross-sectional study. MATERIAL AND METHODS : One hundred women with complaints of vaginal discharge, irregular bleeding, post coital bleeding or unhealthy cervix underwent visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and Lugol«SQ»s iodine (VILI) by a doctor and nurse, followed by colposcopy and biopsy. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED : Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for each test and compared. Concordance was determined by kappa statistics. RESULTS : VIA by nurse had a higher sensitivity (100% versus 87.5%), but lower specificity (53% versus 63%) when compared with the doctor, but it was not statistically significant. There was moderate agreement between their VIA findings (kappa=0.56). VILI findings were comparable to that of the VIA, both by the doctor and nurse. There was almost perfect agreement (kappa=0.89) between VILI by the doctor and nurse. CONCLUSION : Visual inspection can be performed reliably by trained paramedical workers and doctors and is an effective screening option in low resource settings.


How to cite this article:
Bhatla N, Mukhopadhyay A, Joshi S, Kumar A, Kriplani A, Pandey R M, Verma K. Visual inspection for cervical cancer screening; evaluation by doctor versus paramedical worker.Indian J Cancer 2004;41:32-36


How to cite this URL:
Bhatla N, Mukhopadhyay A, Joshi S, Kumar A, Kriplani A, Pandey R M, Verma K. Visual inspection for cervical cancer screening; evaluation by doctor versus paramedical worker. Indian J Cancer [serial online] 2004 [cited 2019 Sep 19 ];41:32-36
Available from: http://www.indianjcancer.com/article.asp?issn=0019-509X;year=2004;volume=41;issue=1;spage=32;epage=36;aulast=Bhatla;type=0