|Year : 2005 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 46--50
Use of simple hematological, biochemical and clinical parameters to monitor response of multiple myeloma patients on high dose thalidomide therapy
G Uppal1, Vinod Raina2, A Sharma2, M Anand3, R Kumar3, BK Khaitan4, JK Grover1,
1 Department of Pharmacology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, New Delhi - 110 029, India
2 Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, New Delhi - 110 029, India
3 Department of Laboratory Oncology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, New Delhi - 110 029, India
4 Department of Dermatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110 029, India
Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, New Delhi - 110 029
BACKGROUND : Evidence of increased bone marrow vascularity in multiple myeloma (MM) has led to the use of anti-angiogenic drugs especially thalidomide in relapsed or refractory patients. Currently, parameters such as serum/ urine electrophoresis for M (monoclonal) proteins, bone marrow biopsy with touch preparation and b2 microglobulin are routinely used to assess response to therapy. These investigations are expensive, invasive and require high technical setup. AIM : To correlate simple and routine hematological and biochemical parameters with the key marker of disease i.e. M proteins. SETTINGS AND DESIGN : This is an open label, uncontrolled, single-arm study. MATERIALS AND METHODS : Twenty nine refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma patients of both sexes (M=20, F=9) with age ranging between 35-72 years were initiated on 200 mg/day of thalidomide with fortnightly increments of 200 mg to a maximum tolerated dose not exceeding 800 mg/day. All hematological and biochemical parameters were monitored at monthly intervals for one year. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS : Correlation analysis was performed between hemoglobin (Hb), total leukocyte count (TLC), absolute neutrophil count (ANC), platelet count (PC), total proteins (TP), serum albumin and serum globulin on one hand and M protein levels on the other using Pearsons Correlation test by SPSS version 7.5. RESULT : Hb, TLC, ANC, PC and serum albumin levels showed a significant negative correlation with M proteins. A highly significant positive correlation existed between M proteins on one hand and TP and globulin levels on the other. Dryness of skin indicated positive response to therapy. These correlations were found to be significant at the end of one month of therapy in all the above-mentioned parameters except in TLC where it was significant after 2 months of thalidomide therapy. CONCLUSION : Results suggest that sustained efficacy of thalidomide therapy may be amenable to monitoring by these simple, inexpensive and easily available investigations after ascertaining an initial response by M protein and marrow plasmacytosis as these parameters closely follow M protein levels. However more studies are required to further substantiate these findings.
|How to cite this article:|
Uppal G, Raina V, Sharma A, Anand M, Kumar R, Khaitan B K, Grover J K. Use of simple hematological, biochemical and clinical parameters to monitor response of multiple myeloma patients on high dose thalidomide therapy.Indian J Cancer 2005;42:46-50
|How to cite this URL:|
Uppal G, Raina V, Sharma A, Anand M, Kumar R, Khaitan B K, Grover J K. Use of simple hematological, biochemical and clinical parameters to monitor response of multiple myeloma patients on high dose thalidomide therapy. Indian J Cancer [serial online] 2005 [cited 2020 Sep 27 ];42:46-50
Available from: http://www.indianjcancer.com/text.asp?2005/42/1/46/15100
Multiple myeloma is a part of a broad spectrum of plasma cell disorders, which include monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) and solitary plasmacytoma. It accounts for 1% of all malignancies & 10% of malignant hematological neoplasms., It is characterized by the presence of a monoclonal (M) protein in serum or urine, osteolytic bone lesions, increased plasma cells in bone marrow, anemia and hypercalcemia. With identification of angiogenesis as a key pathophysiological process important in growth, local invasiveness and metastases of malignant tumors the use of anti-angiogenic agents has gained importance. Increased angiogenesis has also been demonstrated in MM., The use of anti-angiogenic agent thalidomide in the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM has shown a high overall response rate in the range of 25-64% in different trials.- This agent after almost a gap of 20 years has emerged as an effective new modality of MM treatment with minimal adverse effects.
Bone marrow suppression, as compared to conventional cytotoxic drugs, has not been observed with thalidomide due to its different mechanism of action. In assessment of response to conventional therapy various parameters such as serum/urine electrophoreses, bone marrow biopsy with touch preparation and b2 microglobulin are used. Most of these investigations are costly, invasive and require high technical set up. Hematological and biochemical profile of the patients is done as a part of routine investigations along with the above investigations. We attempted to correlate these hematological and biochemical parameters with M proteins so as to find simple, easily available and cheap alternative parameters for monitoring response to thalidomide therapy. These parameters are part of routine investigations being carried out even at peripheral centers. Secondly, their use for monitoring response will decrease the frequency of currently used expensive investigations. However, these assessment criteria are useful only in context of new anti-angiogenic modalities with minimal side effect profile like thalidomide and not for conventional chemotherapy.
Material and Methods
Twenty nine multiple myeloma patients of both sexes (M=20, F=9) with age ranging between 35-72 years were enrolled in the open-labeled, single-arm study after taking approval from Institute Ethics Committee. Thalidomide was supplied (ThalidomidTM 100) as 100 mg tablets by Grunenthal GmbH, Germany on an individual patient basis. An informed consent (according to WHO guidelines and in accordance with the format provided by Grunenthal laboratory, Germany) was obtained from the patients before initiating therapy.
Inclusion criteria included patients with refractory (non-responders to chemotherapy) relapsed (initial responders to chemotherapy but subsequent progressive disease) multiple myeloma. Patients with liver enzyme levels more than twice the upper limit of normal (SGOT and SGPT >100 IU) at time of inclusion or patients on thalidomide therapy prior to the trial or with any co-existing life threatening condition were excluded from the trial.
Pregnancy test was done in all females in reproductive age group before starting therapy and also patients were advised to use double contraceptive measures during the course of treatment.
Hemogram, blood chemistry, serum or urine M protein levels, bone marrow biopsy and touch preparation and skeletal survey with clinical assessment were done at the start of trial. Thereafter hemogram, blood chemistry, M protein levels and clinical assessment were done at monthly intervals whereas bone marrow biopsy and skeletal X-rays were done at 3 monthly intervals.
Dosage schedule for thalidomide as described by Singhal et al was followed and the patients were initiated on 200 mg/day of thalidomide with fortnightly increments of 200 mg to a maximum tolerated dose not exceeding 800 mg/day. Patients were assessed for 12 months of therapy. The median duration of daily thalidomide administration was 8 months.
Pearsons Correlation Analysis was used for analyzing results for statistical significance by SPSS version 7.5.
A total of 29 patients were included in the present trial. Information and follow-up was available on 26 patients. Of the 26 patients enrolled in the trial 17 had relapsed after conventional chemotherapy (15 patients had > 1 regimen of chemotherapy, 7 patients were enrolled into the trial post peripheral blood stem cell transplant) and 9 patients were refractory to conventional chemotherapy. On an average 7 months had elapsed between start of thalidomide and the last cytotoxic therapy (range is 4-12 months). In none of the patients was thalidomide administered as maintenance therapy. The median duration for which thalidomide was administered was 8 months and 600 mg/day was the most common maximum tolerated dose by the patients.
Baseline investigations of the patients are given in [Table:1]. Patients were closely monitored over a period of 1 year. The patients reported subjective improvement in their general condition within 6 weeks - 2 months of therapy. Response criteria were used according to guidelines of the EBMT/IBMTR (European/International Bone Marrow Transplantation Registry). Out of 26 patients included in the analysis, 16 patients (61.53%) showed positive response to therapy characterized by at least 25-50% decline in serum and/or urine M proteins. Response to treatment is given in [Table:2].
The most common adverse effects reported in the trial were constipation and sedation with an incidence of 100% and 88% respectively. Both adverse effects were noticed at 200 mg/day dose level and were not dose dependent. No increase in severity was seen with in dose of thalidomide. Other important side effects reported were ankle edema, dry skin and peripheral neuropathy. Detailed side effect profile observed in the trial is given in [Table:3]. Out of 26 patients 16 had generalised dryness of skin more marked on the extremities and in some of these patients dryness was severe enough to cause discomfort and/or mild itching. On correlation with M proteins all these patients showed positive response to thalidomide. Ten patients (6 with stable and 4 with progressive disease) did not suffer this feature. In one patient loss of dryness of skin was the initial feature at conversion from stable to progressive disease. It was also observed that the loss of skin dryness was associated with loss of response. However the study was not statistically powered to find any significant correlation between dryness of skin and response to thalidomide. Peripheral neuropathy was reported in 1 patient after 10 months and in 5 after 1 year of daily thalidomide administration. All the patients reporting peripheral neuropathy had received a total dose of more than 200 g. Four patients were on 800 mg/day and 2 were on 600 mg/day dose.
All hematological parameters improved during the course of therapy especially Hb, TLC and PC. None of the patients showing response to thalidomide received any hematological support during the trial duration in the form of blood transfusion and/or erythropoitin administration. These parameters at monthly intervals were correlated with M protein levels using Pearsons correlation (a parametric test), a significant correlation was found between M proteins and hematological parameters. The results showed a highly significant negative correlation between M protein levels on one hand and Hb (r= -0.407, PPPPPPPP<0.01). This correlation was found to be significant after 1 month in all except TLC (significant correlation after 2 months of therapy).
Similarly, a significant negative correlation between albumin and M proteins, a positive correlation between total proteins and M proteins and globulin and M proteins has been seen. Thus a corresponding increase in total proteins and globulin levels and a decline in albumin levels reflect an increase in M proteins. Thus it can be suggested that the sustained efficacy of thalidomide therapy can be monitored by these simple parameters along with clinical assessment instead of repeated serum/urine electrophoresis. It is suggested that initially the response to drugs like thalidomide should be ascertained through M protein levels, marrow plasmacytosis and clinical examination and thereafter these simple parameters should be considered for the assessment of sustained efficacy of non-cytotoxic treatment modalities such as thalidomide. Also important is the fact that these simpler investigations are routinely done, even at peripheral hospitals, thus task of monitoring the patients can be made simpler, easier and cheaper. This information is of importance in the current Indian context where the sophisticated instrumentation required for repetitive high resolution serum and urine electrophoresis is not available at all centers. However simple hematological and biochemical parameters can be evaluated even at peripheral centers. Thus these simple parameters can help us monitor the disease process.
The cost of doing repetitive high resolution electrophoresis of serum along with densitometry, high resolution electrophoresis of urine and immunofixation in our institute is roughly around Rs. 1000. Whereas the cost of Complete Blood Count along with Total protein, serum albumin and globulin on an average is Rs. 100. Hence our proposed parameters are 10 times more cost effective than repetitive M protein measurements.
However more studies with larger sample size are required to validate these findings. It also needs to be kept in mind that changes in these simple hematological and biochemical parameters are associated with various conditions like infection, fever, etc. However when looked at in the background of multiple myeloma, these changes are strongly associated with the disease itself. Moreover changes observed due to other conditions would not persist for this long duration. Also other conditions would be associated with their own signs and symptoms.
Thus we propose that in the changing scenario of treatment modalities for MM, simple parameters must be considered carefully to assess their status as markers for response to anti-angiogenic therapies especially thalidomide as these may prove to be sensitive end points for response to therapy.
We acknowledge Grunenthal GMbH, Germany for supplying thalidomide for the trial.
|1||Bataille R, Harousseau JL. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1657-64.|
|2||Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T, Michael T. Cancer Statistics. Ca Cancer J Clin 2001;51:5-36. |
|3||Gasparini G. The rationale and future potential of angiogenesis inhibitors in neoplasia. Drugs 1999;58:17-38.|
|4||Fox SB. Tumor angiogenesis and prognosis. Histpoathology 1997;30:294-301.|
|5||Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis- correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1-8.|
|6||D'Amato RJ, Loughnan MS, Flynn E, Folkman J. Thalidomide is an inhibitor of angiogenesis. USA: Proc Natl Acad Sci; 1994;91:4082-5.|
|7||Singhal S, Mehta J, Desikan R, Ayers D, Roberson P, Eddlemon P, et al. Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1565-71.|
|8||Juliusson G, Celsing F, Turesson I, Lenhoff S, Adriansson M, Malm C. Frequent good partial remissions from thalidomide including best response ever in patients with advanced refractory and relapsed myeloma. Br J Haematol 2000;109:89-96.|
|9||Kneller A, Raanani P, Hardan IA, Levi I, Berkowicz M, et al. Therapy with thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma - the revival of an old drug. Br J Hematol 2000;106:391-3. |
|10||Rajkumar SV, Fonseca R, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Lust JA, Witzig TE, et al. Thalidomide in the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc 2000;75:897-902.|
|11||Barlogie B, Desikan R, Eddlemon P, Spencer T, Zeldis J, Munshi N, et al. Extended survival in advanced and refractory multiple myeloma after single-agent thalidomide: Identification of prognostic factors in a phase 2 study of 169 patients. Blood 2001;98:492-4.|
|12||Yakoub-Agha I, Attal M, Dumontet C, Delannoy V, Moreau P, Berthou C, et al. Thalidomide in patients with advanced multiple myeloma: A study of 83 patients-report of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome (IFM). Hematol J 2002;3:185-92.|
|13||Neben K, Moehler T, Benner A, Kraemer A, Egerer G, Ho AD, et al. Dose-dependent effect of thalidomide on overall survival in relapsed multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res 2002;8:3377-82.|
|14||Mileshkin L, Biagi JJ, Mitchell P, Underhill C, Grigg A, Bell R, et al. Multicenter phase 2 trial of thalidomide in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Adverse prognostic impact of advanced age. Blood 2003;102:69-77.|
|15||Blade J, Samson D, Reece D, Apperley J, Bjorkstrand B, Gahrton G, et al. Criteria for definition of response, relapse and progression in multiple myeloma after high-dose therapy. Br J Haematol 1998;102:1115-23.|