Indian Journal of Cancer Home 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
[View FULLTEXT] [Download PDF]
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 56  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 211--215

A prospective, randomized study to compare the combination of imatinib and cytarabine versus imatinib alone in newly diagnosed patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia

Priyanka Samal, Prantar Chakrabarti, Uttam K Nath 
 Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine (IHTM), Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Correspondence Address:
Priyanka Samal
Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine (IHTM), Kolkata, West Bengal
India

INTRODUCTION: To compare the efficacy and safety of imatinib and cytarabine (ara-c) combination versus imatinib monotherapy in newly diagnosed patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized study included adult patients (age >18 years) with newly diagnosed CML-CP. Patients received either a single oral dose of imatinib 400 mg/day in combination with a subcutaneous injection of ara-c 20 mg/m2/day (imatinib + ara-c) or a single oral dose of imatinib 400 mg/day. Primary endpoints were hematological and molecular responses at 3 months and cytogenetic responses at 6 and 12 months. Secondary endpoints included grade 3/4 hematological and nonhematological adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Of 30 patients included, 14 were randomized to imatinib + ara-c and 16 to imatinib alone. Complete hematologic response (CHR) at 3 months was higher with imatinib + ara-c vs. imatinib alone (100% vs. 87.5%, P = 0.48). The median time to achieve CHR was significantly (P < 0.001) lower with imatinib + ara-c (32.07 vs. 23.43 days). Molecular response at 3 months was significantly higher (P = 0.04) with imatinib + ara-c vs. imatinib alone (100% vs. 68.75%). Complete cytogenetic response was also higher with imatinib + ara-c vs. imatinib alone (42.85% vs. 25% at 6 months and 71.4% vs. 62.5% at 12 months). Neutropenia followed by thrombocytopenia and anemia were the most common AEs. Grade 3/4 hematological and nausea events were significantly (P < 0.05) higher with imatinib + ara-c. Other nonhematological events were not significantly different between the treatments. The median follow-up duration was 20 months (range: 15–23 months). CONCLUSION: Imatinib with low-dose ara-c can be considered as a potential first-line treatment option for CML-CP.


How to cite this article:
Samal P, Chakrabarti P, Nath UK. A prospective, randomized study to compare the combination of imatinib and cytarabine versus imatinib alone in newly diagnosed patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia.Indian J Cancer 2019;56:211-215


How to cite this URL:
Samal P, Chakrabarti P, Nath UK. A prospective, randomized study to compare the combination of imatinib and cytarabine versus imatinib alone in newly diagnosed patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Indian J Cancer [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Jan 21 ];56:211-215
Available from: http://www.indianjcancer.com/article.asp?issn=0019-509X;year=2019;volume=56;issue=3;spage=211;epage=215;aulast=Samal;type=0