Indian Journal of Cancer
Home  ICS  Feedback Subscribe Top cited articles Login 
Users Online :141
Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Navigate here
  Search
 
  Next article
  Previous article 
  Table of Contents
  
Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
   Article in PDF (241 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2241    
    Printed90    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded456    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 

GUEST EDITORIAL
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 47  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 95-97
 

Breast cancer: Search for new targets and improvement of existing techniques


1 Assistant Professor and Medical Oncologist, PSG Institute of Medical Science and Research, Avinashi road, Peelamedu, Coimatore - 641 004, India
2 Honorary Medical Oncologist, Hematologist and Convener, ICON ARO, Mumbai, India

Date of Web Publication5-May-2010

Correspondence Address:
R Bharath
Assistant Professor and Medical Oncologist, PSG Institute of Medical Science and Research, Avinashi road, Peelamedu, Coimatore - 641 004
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-509X.62993

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Bharath R, Parikh P M. Breast cancer: Search for new targets and improvement of existing techniques. Indian J Cancer 2010;47:95-7

How to cite this URL:
Bharath R, Parikh P M. Breast cancer: Search for new targets and improvement of existing techniques. Indian J Cancer [serial online] 2010 [cited 2020 Oct 21];47:95-7. Available from: https://www.indianjcancer.com/text.asp?2010/47/2/95/62993


Hereditary breast cancer syndromes, though uncommon, provide us with insights into the pathogenesis of these tumors. Women diagnosed with high risk breast cancer may avail of risk reduction strategies like bilateral mastectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy or chemoprevention in addition to close follow-up and screening to facilitate early detection. [1] The use of chemoprevention with Tamoxifen (for five years) is associated with a risk reduction of 40-50% but used uncommonly. [2] The logical direction of future research is therefore to identify targets in each specific high risk breast cancer genotype and tailor more effective therapy accordingly. Effective and targeted chemo preventive agents have the potential to treat such women who carry these mutations (breast cancer gene - BRCA- 1) without the need for physically and psychologically mutilating surgeries. In addition, down regulation of BRCA gene is noted in many sporadic breast cancers in the absence of mutations suggesting a link between this gene and breast cancer pathogenesis. Hockings et al. have proposed that activation of BRCA-1 transcription by estrogen requires occupancy of the BRCA-1 promoter by the unliganded aromatic hydrocarbon receptor. They have stressed the importance of the aromatic hydrocarbon ligands [benzo(a)pyrene [B(a)P] and 2, 3, 7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)] in activation of BRCA-1 promoter by estrogen. [3] In this issue, Wiwanitkit [4] explores the ligand binding sites on the BRCA-1 molecule using standard bioinformatics tools. The actual benefits of how such identification of ligands on the BRCA-1 molecule can influence treatment needs more laboratory and clinical work (e.g. identification of targets and molecules that bind to these targets and demonstration of efficacy as chemoprevention strategies in BRCA-1 mutation positive women or therapeutic targeting in sporadic breast cancers with down-regulated BRCA 1 gene [5] ). Wiwanitkit's work, hopefully, will be an important step towards development of such targeted agents.

The second article on breast cancer evaluates the quality of life (QoL) amongst younger women with the disease. [6] This study has looked at women less than 35 years of age, a special subgroup of very young women (most existing studies on younger patients included those less than 50 years of age). Younger women are expected to have a different psychological and body image perception compared to older women, a difference that can strongly influence the type of surgery opted for. [7],[8] In Indian women with breast cancer, quality of sexual life and sexual satisfaction are almost never discussed by the oncologists and patients - considered "taboo" topics. Numerous studies have shown that the overall QoL improves in breast cancer survivors with passage of time and this is confirmed in the present study. [9],[10],[11],[12] Hartl et al. in a similar long term follow-up study of QoL report better body image and sexual functioning in women who underwent BCS at the cost of increased fear of recurrence. [13],[14] Schover has looked at sexual function after breast cancer treatment and reported better body image perception in women after breast conservation. [15] Avis et al. have published results from two different studies specifically in younger women addressing QoL and sexual function. The body image perception and sexual function were worse in younger women with mastectomy. [15],[16],[17] The deterioration in sexual function was significantly higher in breast cancer survivors compared to non-patient women of similar age. This continued to increase as the women aged, with the breast cancer survivors requiring more intervention to aid sexual functioning. Janni et al. have reported results from a matched pair analysis in survivors of breast cancer comparing mastectomy with BCS and have found no difference in general QoL, but reported increased cosmetic dissatisfaction and consequent psychological stress. [18] The findings in the present study, among the very young breast cancer survivors, bring forth some important contradictions. They have reported non-improvement in body image score following BCS and increased fear of recurrence in the mastectomy group! This study emphasizes the fact that women younger than 35 years form a unique group; they are almost always premenopausal, lead more active professional and sexual life, need many years of follow-up to monitor recurrence and address treatment related long term toxicities. These very young women consequently require additional measures, beyond the standard QoL questionnaires, to identify their unique problems. [19],[20],[21]

The article on breast cancer by Radhika and Prayaga in this issue is a comparison of immunocytochemistry (ICC) with immunohistochemistry (IHC) in evaluating hormonal receptor status in breast cancer. [22] Immunocytochemistry offers the pathologist an alternative technique to determine hormonal receptor status when tissue biopsy is unavailable or inadequate. The performance of ICC on destained papinocoloau slides has been a technique useful when adequate tissue is not available and a retrospective confirmation of malignancy is required. [23] This situation is commonly encountered in India where women with breast cancers receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the basis of a cytological diagnosis. Complete pathological response does occur in a significant fraction with consequent non-availability of viable cancer tissue for formal IHC. [23],[24] The changes in the hormonal receptor status induced by chemotherapy also need to be taken into consideration when IHC is being performed on post chemotherapy residual tissue submitted after mastectomy/BCS. The standardization of laboratory procedures including fixation, antigen retrieval and immunostaining has been a subject of intense work with a large number of publications in the last two decades. In spite of this, consensus is lacking across different laboratories. The shift of estrogen receptor (ER) testing by IHC on paraffin embedded tissue from the traditional Dextran coated charcoal assay (DCCA) has been an issue plagued by standardization issues and the further shift to ICC has been equally debated. [25],[26],[27] Gong et al. from M.D Anderson Cancer Center evaluated varying methods available for fixation of cytological smears (like Abbott method, 10% formalin at room temperature, Carnoy's fixative followed by pap staining). Air drying of smears prior to fixation was also attempted in some smears. The importance of antigen retrieval in ER immunodetection has been emphasized in their paper. [28] Krishnamurthy et al. from the same group have demonstrated significant variability in ER immunocytochemical staining with different antibodies. [29] They also found poorer concordance in pap-destained smears as compared with pap stained smears for ER ICC performed using H222 monoclonal antibody in formaldehyde -methanol-acetone fixed smears.

In contrast, the present article reports better ER ICC positivity with pap destained smears. [27] Since the authors have used both prospectively and retrospectively collected samples as well as different secondary antibodies, these differences may have had an impact on the results. The overall ER positivity rate reported by the authors is lower than that reported from the largest Indian series by Shet et al. Geographic variations, racial differences, selection bias (younger patients with higher stage and histological grade being referred to a large referral center) and technical issues may explain this variation. [30],[31] The significant differences in hormone receptor positivity with changes in fixation and antigen retrieval methods, antibodies used reported by Shet et al. compared to the previous study from the same center by Desai et al. should also prompt a closer look at all the steps involved. [32],[33],[34] The use of IHC in hormonal receptor testing is itself not standardized in many centers and the performance of ICC for hormone receptor testing should be taken up as routine practice only after rigorous standardization.

The authors have demonstrated the feasibility of ICC, which is expected to be less expensive, compared to IHC and we must echo their words regarding the need of interlaboratory collaboration and external quality assurance schemes on national and international basis. This cannot be overemphasized considering that the hormonal receptor positivity and the methodology of determining hormone receptor status have both prognostic and therapeutic implications.

 
  References Top

1.Robson M, Offit K. Clinical practice: Management of an inherited predisposition to breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;357:154-62.  Back to cited text no. 1      
2.Metcalfe KA, Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Lubinski J, Gronwald J, Lynch H, Moller P, et al. International variation in rates of uptake of preventive options in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Int J Cancer 2008;122:2017-22.  Back to cited text no. 2      
3.Hockings JK, Thorne PA, Kemp MQ, Morgan SS, Selmin O, Romagnolo DF. The ligand status of the aromatic hydrocarbon receptor modulates transcriptional activation of BRCA-1 promoter by estrogen. Cancer Res 2006;66:2224-32.  Back to cited text no. 3      
4.Wiwanitkit V. Ligand binding prediction for BRCA1, a key molecule in the pathogensis of breast cancer. Indian J Cancer 2010;47:139-141.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
5.Xu CF, Chambers JA, Solomon E. Complex regulation of the BRCA1 gene. J Biol Chem 1997;272:20994-7.  Back to cited text no. 5      
6.Dubashi B, Vidhubala E, Cyriac S, Sagar TG. Quality of life among younger women with breast cancer: Study from a tertiary cancer institute in south India. Indian J Cancer 2010;47:142-7.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
7.Arndt V, Stegmaier C, Ziegler H, Brenner H. Quality of life over 5 years in women with breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy: A population-based study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2008;134:1311-8.   Back to cited text no. 7      
8.Engel J, Kerr J, Schlesinger-Raab A, Sauer H, Hφlzel D. Quality of life following breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy: Results of a 5-year prospective study. Breast J 2004;10:223-31.  Back to cited text no. 8      
9.Wenzel LB, Fairclough DL, Brady MJ, Cella D, Garrett KM, Kluhsman BC, et al. Age-related differences in the quality of life of breast carcinoma patients after treatment. Cancer 1999;86:1768-74.   Back to cited text no. 9      
10.Casso D, Buist DS, Taplin S. Quality of life of 5-10 year breast cancer survivors diagnosed between age 40 and 49. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004;2:25.  Back to cited text no. 10      
11.Bloom JR, Stewart SL, Chang S, Banks PJ. Then and now: Quality of life of young breast cancer survivors. Psychooncology 2004;13:147-60.  Back to cited text no. 11      
12.Montazeri A. Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: A bibliographic review of the literature from 1974 to 2007. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2008;27:32.  Back to cited text no. 12      
13.Hδrtl K, Schennach R, Mόller M, Engel J, Reinecker H, Sommer H, Friese K. Quality of life, anxiety, and oncological factors: A follow-up study of breast cancer patients. Psychosomatics 2010;51:112-23.  Back to cited text no. 13      
14.Hδrtl K, Janni W, Kδstner R, Sommer H, Strobl B, Rack B, et al. Impact of medical and demographic factors on long-term quality of life and body image of breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2003;14:1064-71.  Back to cited text no. 14      
15.Schover LR. Sexuality and body image in younger women with breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1994;16:177-82.  Back to cited text no. 15      
16.Avis NE, Crawford S, Manuel J. Quality of life among younger women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:3322-30.  Back to cited text no. 16      
17.Avis NE, Crawford S, Manuel J. Psychosocial problems among younger women with breast cancer. Psychooncology 2004;13:295-308.  Back to cited text no. 17      
18.Janni W, Rjosk D, Dimpfl TH, Haertl K, Strobl B, Hepp F, et al. Quality of life influenced by primary surgical treatment for stage I-III breast cancer-long-term follow-up of a matched-pair analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8:542-8.  Back to cited text no. 18      
19.Fobair P, Stewart SL, Chang S, D'Onofrio C, Banks PJ, Bloom JR. Body image and sexual problems in young women with breast cancer. Psychooncology 2006;15:579-94.  Back to cited text no. 19      
20.Burwell SR, Case LD, Kaelin C, Avis NE. Sexual problems in younger women after breast cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2815-21.  Back to cited text no. 20      
21.Wenzel LB, Fairclough DL, Brady MJ, Cella D, Garrett KM, Kluhsman BC, et al. Age-related differences in the quality of life of breast carcinoma patients after treatment. Cancer 1999;86:1768-74.  Back to cited text no. 21      
22.Radhika K, Prayaga AK. Estrogen and progesterone hormone receptor status in breast carcinoma: Comparison of immunocytochemistry and immunohistochemistry. Indian J Cancer 2010;47:148-150.  Back to cited text no. 22  [PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
23.Koyatsu J, Ishi K, Suzuki F, Saito A, Kina K, Okazaki T. Usefulness of estrogen receptor detection using archival Papanicolaou-stained smears. Acta Cytol 1999;43:825-30.  Back to cited text no. 23      
24.McClelland RA, Berger U, Wilson P, Powles TJ, Trott PA, Easton D, et al. Presurgical determinationof estrogen receptor status using immunocytochemically stained fine needle aspirate smears in patients with breast cancer. Cancer Res 1987;47:6118-22.  Back to cited text no. 24      
25.Kuerer HM, Sahin AA, Hunt KK, Newman LA, Breslin TM, Ames FC, et al. Incidence and impact of documented eradication of breast cancer axillary lymph node metastases before surgery in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg 1999;230:72-8.  Back to cited text no. 25      
26.Alberts SR, Ingle JN, Roche PR, Cha SS, Wold LE, Farr GH Jr, et al. Comparison of estrogen receptor determinations by a biochemical ligand-binding assay and immunohistochemical staining with monoclonal antibody ER1D5 in females with lymph node positive breast carcinoma entered on two prospective clinical trials. Cancer 1996;78:764-72.  Back to cited text no. 26      
27.Allred DC, Bustamante MA, Daniel CO, Gaskill HV, Cruz AB Jr. Immunocytochemical analysis of estrogen receptors in human breast carcinomas. Evaluation of 130 cases and review of the literature regarding concordance with biochemical assay and clinical relevance. Arch Surg 1990;125:107-13.  Back to cited text no. 27      
28.Harvey JM, Clark GM, Osborne CK, Allred DC. Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:1474-81.  Back to cited text no. 28      
29.Gong Y, Symmans WF, Krishnamurthy S, Patel S, Sneige N. Optimal fixation conditions for immunocytochemical analysis of estrogen receptor in cytologic specimens of breast carcinoma. Cancer 2004;102:34-40.  Back to cited text no. 29      
30.Krishnamurthy S, Dimashkieh H, Patel S, Sneige N. Immunocytochemical evaluation of estrogen receptor on archival Papanicolaou-stained fine-needle aspirate smears. Diagn Cytopathol 2003;29:309-14.  Back to cited text no. 30      
31.Rhodes A, Jasani B, Barnes DM, Bobrow LG, Miller KD. Reliability of immunohistochemical demonstration of oestrogen receptors in routine practice: Interlaboratory variance in the sensitivity of detection and evaluation of scoring systems. J Clin Pathol 2000;53:125-30.   Back to cited text no. 31      
32.Pertschuk LP, Kim YD, Axiotis CA, Braverman AS, Carter AC, Eisenberg KB, et al. Estrogen receptor immunocytochemistry: The promise and the perils. J Cell Biochem Suppl 1994;19:134-7.  Back to cited text no. 32      
33.Shet T, Agrawal A, Nadkarni M, Palkar M, Havaldar R, Parmar V, et al. Hormone receptors over the last 8 years in a cancer referral center in India: What was and what is? Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2009;52:171-4.  Back to cited text no. 33  [PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
34.Desai SB, Moonim MT, Gill AK, Punia RS, Naresh KN, Chinoy RF. Hormone receptor status of breast cancer in India: A study of 798 tumors. Breast 2000;9:267-70.  Back to cited text no. 34      




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

  Site Map | What's new | Copyright and Disclaimer
  Online since 1st April '07
  2007 - Indian Journal of Cancer | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow