|TOBACCO CONTROL ISSUE - ORIGINAL ARTICLE
|Year : 2014 | Volume
| Issue : 5 | Page : 46-49
Dual use of tobacco among Bangladeshi men
MM Zaman1, MR Bhuiyan1, SM Huq1, MM Rahman2, DN Sinha3, T Fernando1
1 World Health Organization, Dhaka, Bangladesh
2 Bangladesh Society of Medicine, Dhaka, Bangladesh
3 World Health Organization, New Delhi, India
|Date of Web Publication||19-Dec-2014|
M M Zaman
World Health Organization, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Introduction: Dual use of tobacco (using smoking and smokeless forms) in Bangladesh is uncommon in women but common in men. Dual users are at additional risk of cancers and heart diseases compared with a single form of tobacco use. Knowledge about their socioeconomic background is necessary for planning appropriate interventions. We report here socioeconomic background of the dual users of tobacco from a nationally representative survey. Methods: The study adopted a probability proportionate to size sampling technic of divisional population stratified into urban and rural areas to recruit men aged 25 years or older from their households. A total of 4312 men were recruited. Variables included questions on 20 household assets, tobacco use and other behavioral risk factors, and measurement of body weight and height. Results: The average age of dual users was 46.7 years old compared to 43.4 and 52.3 years for smokers and smokeless tobacco users. Prevalence of "smoking only," "smokeless only" and "dual use" of tobacco was 40.6%, 15.2%, and 14.2%, respectively. Among all tobacco users, dual users constituted 20%. These dual users had lower educational achievement, rural residence, lower intake of fruit, and higher intake of alcohol. They were more undernourished as indicated by a thin body mass index compared to nonusers and smokers. Dual users were of socioeconomically deprived as measured by wealth quartiles constructed out of household assets. Conclusion: Dual use of tobacco is common in Bangladesh, and it is intimately linked with socioeconomic deprivation. Poverty reduction strategy and campaigns should address tobacco control not only tobacco in general, but its dual use in particular.
Keywords: Bangladesh, dual use of tobacco, population, smoking and smokeless
|How to cite this article:|
Zaman M M, Bhuiyan M R, Huq S M, Rahman M M, Sinha D N, Fernando T. Dual use of tobacco among Bangladeshi men. Indian J Cancer 2014;51, Suppl S1:46-9
| » Introduction|| |
Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) are causing more than half of hospital deaths in Bangladesh.  Tobacco is the major preventable risk factor of NCDs. Bangladesh has a dual burden of high production and high use of tobacco.  In addition, there is a custom of dual use of tobacco, i.e. using smoking and smokeless forms, especially in men. Fortunately, dual use of tobacco is rare in Bangladeshi women in whom the prevalence was 1.8% only.  Dual use of tobacco increases the risk of some cancers  and carries a higher risk of ischemic heart disease in Bangladeshi [4,5] and other populations. 
In spite of having a good law, vibrant civil society and professional networks in Bangladesh, a reduction in tobacco use yet to be achieved. Probably there is a resistant group, the dual users of tobacco, having high addiction level. It is necessary to have a better understanding about this group for designing an appropriate intervention.
Although dual use in Bangladeshi men is common, a systematic data analysis on dual users is not available. Accordingly, we report here a reanalysis of national NCD risk factors survey 2010  data for men to have a first-hand impression about the socioeconomic background of dual users of tobacco in Bangladesh.
| » Methods|| |
Details of the NCD Survey methods have already been reported.  The original survey covered both men and women, but for this analysis only men were included. Briefly, the target population for this survey includes all Bangladeshi men aged 25 years or older living in 62 districts out of 64 districts of Bangladesh. Two of three hill districts were excluded because they were 'difficult to reach areas'. A total of 400 primary sampling units were identified from rural (mauza) and urban (mahalla) areas. Participants were recruited from their households using a probability proportionate to size approach stratified into rural and urban areas. Based on the sample size calculation for rural-urban subgroup analysis, 5600 men were targeted, but complete data could be obtained from 4312 men (77%). One man per household was interviewed by a male enumerator. No proxy interview was allowed. Data were collected for both households (socioeconomic variables) and individuals (risk factor variables).
Ethical clearance was obtained from Bangladesh Medical Research Council. Detailed study related information was read out to the participants and explained in Bangla (spoken language) from a printed handout. Before data collection, consent in the form of signature or finger impression (for those who cannot sign) was obtained. Confidentiality of data and privacy of the respondents were maintained. 
The questionnaire was based on World Health Organization (WHO) STEPwise Surveillance.  The household component of the questionnaire included a 20-item asset information. Information of tobacco was collected for both smoking and smokeless forms. Those who smoked or used smokeless tobacco (SLT) in the past 30 days were considered as "current" users. Daily frequency of use of products was asked. Relevant information on education, occupation, and intake of fruit and alcohol was obtained. Height and weight were measured to calculate body mass index (BMI). Questionnaire was in standard Bangla, and it was field tested before deployment of the professional field team for data collection.
Data management and analysis
Data were entered into handheld personal devices (iPAQ) by interviewers. Data were transferred from the field to a file transfer protocol server on a daily basis. Data at central level were managed by a professional data manager.
Proportions between groups were obtained and compared by using the Chi-square test. Quantitative variable with a skewed distribution was compared by using Kruskal-Wallis test. Significance level was set at alpha threshold of 0.05. Wealth index of households was created from ownership of 20-item assets using principle component analysis.  The sample was divided into wealth quartiles from one (lowest) to four (highest). Distribution of the various forms of tobacco use across the quartiles was then examined. Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis was done, keeping quantitative variable as quantitative, to identify independent significant socioeconomic variables related to dual use of tobacco. All analyses were done using SPSS 17.0 version.
| » Results|| |
[Table 1] presents the results for a sample of 4312 men from all over the country. Their mean age was 45.5 years (standard deviation 14.5 years). Half (50.4%) of them were from urban areas as stipulated in the study design. They had a median schooling of five years. About one-fifth (22.8%) of them were farmers, one-fifth (19.7%) were laborer (agriculture, industrial or otherwise), one-fifth (22.5%) were businessmen, and 16% were salaried employee in public and nonpublic sectors. Ninety percent were Muslims.
|Table 1: Prevalence (%) of tobacco use in smoking, smokeless or dual forms (n=4312) according to sociodemographic factors |
Click here to view
Tobacco use overall
Proportion of current "smoking only" was 40.6% [Table 1]. They were mostly cigarette (69.0%) and bidi (42.8%) smokers. Rest (6.6%) used other forms. The percentages do not add to 100% because of multiple usages. Popularity of hukkah (water pipe) as a vehicle to smoke has been lost. Smoking prevalence across age groups was almost homogeneous with a substantial decline in the elderly people aged 65 years or older (27.6%), which might reflect a survival effect. In this survey, 15.2% used "SLT." As opposed to smoking only, its prevalence increased with age. Among the SLT users, 66.3% used jarda/zarda, 33.5% used sada pata and 17.4% used gul. As in the case of smoking, there have been multiple usages in SLT also.
[Table 1] also describes the prevalence of dual use of tobacco. In this sample, 14.2% men used dual forms. Men aged 45-64 years used dual forms more often (18.1%). In two extreme age groups, nearly one in ten men used dual form of tobacco. Their frequency (number of sticks and number of episodes of SLT) of tobacco use was 18/day, which was higher than any single form of tobacco use (smoking only 9/day and smokeless only 7/day). This gave a clue to a higher level of addiction in dual users compared to single users. Prevalence of dual use of tobacco was more in rural areas (16%) compared to urban areas (13.5%). Dual use was more common in laborers (19.5%) and by farmers (15.3%). Among all tobacco users, 58% were smokers only, 22% were SLT users only and 20% were dual users.
The participants were grouped into four quartiles (first being the poorest) according to household assets based on principal component analysis. [Figure 1] shows an intimate link of tobacco use in general (single use or in combination) with socioeconomic deprivation. There was a constant decline of prevalence after the second quartile. However, this decline was sharper in the case of dual users.
|Figure 1: Prevalence (%) of tobacco use in single or combined forms according to wealth quartiles|
Click here to view
[Table 2] gives the distribution of other socioeconomic factors across three groups of tobacco users in this sample. Tobacco users in general were found to have significantly lower educational achievements and wealth quartiles compared with non-users. They had significantly lower intake of fruit. Some of them had an additional habit of using alcohol more than non-users of tobacco. As a result, they presumably had less money to buy nutritious food. This conviction is supported by their very thin body (BMI < 18.5 kg/m 2 ). All the deprivations described above are more prominent in dual users compared to single user groups (in general) or non-users.
|Table 2: Socioeconomic deprivation associated with dual use of tobacco (n=4312) |
Click here to view
The above mentioned socioeconomic factors could be inter-dependent. To find out the independent factor(s) associated with the dual use of tobacco, Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis was performed entering age, residence, education, wealth indices, alcohol use, fruit intake and BMI altogether into the model. All variables except residence and alcohol consumption entered into the model had quantitative values. Significance of all other variables except wealth indices disappeared in the presence of wealth indices in the statistical model (data not shown).
| » Discussion|| |
We report here for the first time in Bangladesh the factors associated with dual use of tobacco from a national survey.  The dual users constitute exactly one in five of all tobacco users. Their addiction level probably provides a substantial resistance to the inventions for quitting. At the same time they are hard to reach people because of low media exposures as perceived from their lack of household assets like cell phone, radio and television.
Prevalence of dual use in India was >6% for comparable age group  and 4% in US blue collar people  and 6% in Nigerians.  In India, dual use is more prevalent in people having no or little education and those living in rural areas.  Like our sample of Bangladeshi people,  Nigerian dual users were less educated and the US dual users were binge drinkers. In this study, two-third Bangladeshi alcohols users are binge drinkers  and most of them fall under dual user category. Our findings are similar to all studies mentioned above, but we report here a more rigorous assessment of the socioeconomic deprivation. The above facts may suggest that the dual users have fairly similar social characteristics in most of the places.
In our sample, the prevalence of SLT runs parallel to the prevalence of dual use. Almost half of all SLT users smokers as well. Many Bangladeshi people perceive that smoking brings more pleasure if it is done concomitantly with chewing of tobacco leaves with betel quid. Therefore, efficient control of smoking will depend on the control of SLT to a large extent. If we consider smoking alone and in combination with SLT, more than half of Bangladeshi men are addicted to tobacco.
The tobacco epidemic in South Asia is relatively complex because various forms of tobacco are being used. SLT itself has several forms, such as jarda, sada pata, pan masala, gul, khoinee, gutka, etc., SLT use in Bangladesh is one of the highest in the world. Many people believe that the SLT is not harmful. Contrary to this belief, SLT can cause several chronic diseases. [2-6] Oral cancer is one of them.  Oral cancer is the second leading cancer in Bangladeshi men after lung cancer.  Therefore, control of SLT deserves special emphasis in Bangladesh. SLT use has a very high level of cultural acceptance. Accordingly, culturally appropriate public awareness campaigns will be required to combat it.
Bangladesh enacted the Tobacco Control Act in 2005. Unfortunately, SLT was not included in the definition of tobacco in that Act. This was controlled by the belief that SLT is not bad for health. Perhaps, in line with this many people quit smoking but started using SLT as a substitute. Considering its public health consequences, the Government of Bangladesh, has already amended the Tobacco Control Act 2005 in 2013 to include SLT in the definition of tobacco. The battle ground for combating the dual use of tobacco has started in the real sense in 2013. There has been a plateauing of tobacco use in Bangladesh in the past few years.  A big push is now required to combat the tobacco menace especially the dual usages. Given that the dual use is intimately linked to poverty, poverty reduction strategies will supplement tobacco control activities. Along with the smoking products, smokeless products should also be brought under stringent tax networks to get expected the benefit. 
| » Conclusion|| |
Dual use of tobacco is associated with socioeconomic deprivation in Bangladeshi men. Given that dual use is a common practice, especially among the poor, population-based interventions addressing inequity should be used. Poverty reduction strategies should consider tobacco control in general and their dual use in particular. Tobacco control campaigns should emphasize the cumulative harms of dual use of tobacco.
| » Acknowledgments|| |
We are indebted to the Bangladesh Society of Medicine for their support and supervision for the field execution of the study. The original survey on noncommunicable disease risk factor survey (out of which this report is prepared) was technically supported by the World Health Organization Country Office for Bangladesh.
| » References|| |
Government of Bangladesh, Ministry of health and Family Welfare, Directorate General of Health Services, Management Information System. Dhaka: Health Bulletin 2012.
Zaman MM, Nargis N, Perucic AM, Rahman K, editors. Impact of Tobacco-Related Illnesses in Bangladesh. New Delhi: World Health Organization; 2007.
Znaor A, Brennan P, Gajalakshmi V, Mathew A, Shanta V, Varghese C, et al.
Independent and combined effects of tobacco smoking, chewing and alcohol drinking on the risk of oral, pharyngeal and esophageal cancers in Indian men. Int J Cancer 2003;105:681-6.
Rahman MA, Zaman MM. Smoking and smokeless tobacco consumption: Possible risk factors for coronary heart disease among young patients attending a tertiary care cardiac hospital in Bangladesh. Public Health 2008;122:1331-8.
Zaman MM, Ahmed J, Choudhury SR, Numan SM, Parvin K, Islam MS. Prevalence of ischemic heart disease in a rural population of Bangladesh. Indian Heart J 2007;59:239-41.
Teo KK, Ounpuu S, Hawken S, Pandey MR, Valentin V, Hunt D, et al.
Tobacco use and risk of myocardial infarction in 52 countries in the INTERHEART study: A case-control study. Lancet 2006;368:647-58.
World Health Organization. Non-Communicable Disease Risk Factor Survey, Bangladesh 2010. Dhaka: WHO; 2011. Available from: http://www.searo.who.int/bangladesh/publications/ncd_risk_factor_2010/en/.
Bonita R, de Courten M, Dwyer T, Jamrozik K, Winkelmann R. Surveillance of Risk Factors for Non-Communicable Diseases: The WHO STEPwise Approach Summary. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
Gupta PC, Ray CS, Narake SS, Palipudi KM, Sinha DN, Asma S, et al.
Profile of dual tobacco users in India: An analysis from Global Adult Tobacco Survey, 2009-10. Indian J Cancer 2012;49:393-400.
Noonan D, Duffy SA. Factors associated with smokeless tobacco use and dual use among blue collar workers. Public Health Nurs 2014;31:19-27.
Ayo-Yusuf OA, Odukoya OO, Olutola BG. Sociodemographic correlates of exclusive and concurrent use of smokeless and smoked tobacco products among Nigerian men. Nicotine Tob Res 2014;16:641-6.
Hussain SA, Sullivan R. Cancer control in Bangladesh. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2013;43:1159-69.
Zaman MM. Trends in non-communicable diseases. Presented in the National Public Health Conference of Bangladesh, Dhaka; 2013. Available from: http://www.iedcr.org/pdf/files/NPHC%20WEB/UPLOAD-4/Dr.Zaman.pdf.
Jha P, Peto R. Global effects of smoking, of quitting, and of taxing tobacco. N Engl J Med 2014;370:60-8.
[Table 1], [Table 2]
|This article has been cited by|
||Prevalence and determinants of dual and poly-tobacco use among males in 19 low-and middle-income countries: Implications for a comprehensive tobacco control regulation
| ||Daniel Tzu-Hsuan Chen, Christopher Millett, Filippos T. Filippidis |
| ||Preventive Medicine. 2021; 142: 106377 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Dual Burden of Smoked and Smokeless Tobacco Use in India, 2009–2017: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Analysis Based on Global Adult Tobacco Survey
| ||Prashant Kumar Singh, Amit Yadav, Pranay Lal, Dhirendra N Sinha, Prakash C Gupta, Leimapokpam Swasticharan, Shalini Singh, Ravi Mehrotra |
| ||Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2020; 22(12): 2196 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Social determinants of dual tobacco use in India: An analysis based on the two rounds of global adult tobacco survey
| ||Prashant Kumar Singh, Amit Yadav, Lucky Singh, Shalini Singh, Ravi Mehrotra |
| ||Preventive Medicine Reports. 2020; 18: 101073 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Socio-demographic characteristics and tobacco use among the adults in urban slums of Dhaka, Bangladesh
| ||Nusrat Nausheen Khandker,Tuhin Biswas,Abdullah Nurus Salam Khan,Enamul Hasib,Lal B Rawal |
| ||Tobacco Induced Diseases. 2017; 15(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Alcohol consumption among adults in Bangladesh: Results from STEPS 2010
| ||JessicaYasmine Islam,MMostafa Zaman,MahfuzR Bhuiyan,MdMahtabuddin Hasan,HAMNazmul Ahsan,MdMujibur Rahman,MdRidwanur Rahman,MA Jalil Chowdhury |
| ||WHO South-East Asia Journal of Public Health. 2017; 6(1): 67 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Socioeconomic status and non-communicable disease behavioural risk factors in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review
| ||Luke Allen,Julianne Williams,Nick Townsend,Bente Mikkelsen,Nia Roberts,Charlie Foster,Kremlin Wickramasinghe |
| ||The Lancet Global Health. 2017; 5(3): e277 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Prevalence and Sociodemographic Determinants of Any Tobacco Use and Dual Use in Six Countries of the WHO South-East Asia Region: Findings From the Demographic and Health Surveys
| ||Dhirendra N. Sinha,Rizwan A. Suliankatchi,Ritvik Amarchand,Anand Krishnan |
| ||Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2016; 18(5): 750 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Clustering of non-communicable diseases risk factors in Bangladeshi adults: An analysis of STEPS survey 2013
| ||M. Mostafa Zaman,Mahfuzur Rahman Bhuiyan,Md. Nazmul Karim,Md. Nazmul MoniruzZaman,Md. Mukhlesur Rahman,Abdul Waheed Akanda,Thushara Fernando |
| ||BMC Public Health. 2015; 15(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Trends of Smokeless Tobacco use among Adults (Aged 15-49 Years) in Bangladesh, India and Nepal
| ||Dhirendra N Sinha,SA Rizwan,Krishna K Aryal,Khem B Karki,Mostafa M Zaman,Prakash C Gupta |
| ||Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2015; 16(15): 6561 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|