| [Download PDF]
|Year : 2009 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 54--60
Survival effects of cyclooxygenase-2 and 12-lipooxygenase in Egyptian women with operable breast cancer
AA Zeeneldin1, AM Mohamed2, HA Abdel2, FM Taha3, IA Goda4, WT AboDeef4,
1 Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, NCI, Cairo Univ, Egypt
2 Department of Cancer Biology, Faculty of Medicine, NCI, Cairo Univ, Egypt
3 Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, NCI, Cairo Univ, Egypt
4 Surgical Pathology, NCI, Cairo Univ, Egypt
A A Zeeneldin
Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, NCI, Cairo Univ
Background: Breast cancer (BC) is the commonest among women in Egypt as well as in many other countries. Cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) and 12-lipo-oxygenase (12-LOX) are over-expressed in 30-40% of patients and carry a poor prognosis. The objectives of this study were to correlate COX-2 and 12-LOX expression with various clinico-pathologic patients«SQ» characteristics and their impact on overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) in Egyptian women with operable BC. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included 57 consecutive BC cases presenting to the Egyptian National Cancer Institute. Sections from BC and nearby normal tissues were examined for expression of COX-2 and 12-LOX using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Results: The patients«SQ» median age was 45 years. Fifty-three percent were premenopausal. Stage II and III disease represented 25 and 75% respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy and tamoxifen were used in 90, 75 and 60% respectively. Sixty percent had hormone-receptor positive tumors and 28% over-expressed HER2/neu. Forty-nine and sixty-five percent showed over-expression of COX-2 and 12-LOX respectively. Patients with higher TNM stage or who developed visceral metastases had significantly higher COX-2 expression. For the whole group of patients, the median DFS was 37 months, while the median OS was not reached. OS or DFS did not differ significantly between patients with normal and over-expression of COX-2. DFS but not OS was significantly higher in 12-LOX over-expression compared to normal expression. Conclusion: COX-2 over-expression was associated with poor prognostic criteria in BC, but did not affect DFS or OS. 12-LOX over-expression was associated with better DFS, but not OS.
|How to cite this article:|
Zeeneldin A A, Mohamed A M, Abdel H A, Taha F M, Goda I A, AboDeef W T. Survival effects of cyclooxygenase-2 and 12-lipooxygenase in Egyptian women with operable breast cancer.Indian J Cancer 2009;46:54-60
|How to cite this URL:|
Zeeneldin A A, Mohamed A M, Abdel H A, Taha F M, Goda I A, AboDeef W T. Survival effects of cyclooxygenase-2 and 12-lipooxygenase in Egyptian women with operable breast cancer. Indian J Cancer [serial online] 2009 [cited 2020 Oct 20 ];46:54-60
Available from: https://www.indianjcancer.com/text.asp?2009/46/1/54/48597
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common type of cancer and the most common cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide.  In Egypt, BC is the first in females representing 37% of all female cancers presenting to National Cancer Institute, Cairo University. 
Following surgery for operable BC, many prognostic factors help in the choice of systemic therapy including axillary lymph node status, size of the primary tumor and its grade and also the patient's age. As predictors for response to systemic therapy, hormone receptor positivity and HER2/neu over-expression are predictors of response to hormonal manipulations and trastuzumab respectively. Efforts are continuous seeking novel prognostic and predictive factors in BC. 
Cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) and 12-lipo-oxygenase (12-LOX) potentially serve as prognostic and predictive factors. Many investigators reported poor disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with over-expression of COX-2. ,,,,, Significance of 12-LOX in BC is not yet well established and is less reported than COX-2. Connolly et al. reported rapid growth and high angiogenic activity in 12-LOX gene-transfected MCF-7 human breast cancer cells in athymic nude mice. 
COX and LOX enzymes act on arachidonic acid as a substrate to form various eicosanoids. COX is a key enzyme responsible for the biosynthesis of endoperoxides that are converted into prostaglandins (PGs) and thromboxanes (TXs). LOX provides hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic acid (HPETE) that can be converted into leukotrienes, hepoxilins, trioxilins and lipoxins. Inhibition of COX directs arachidonic acid to LOX pathway.  COX-2, 5-LOX and 12-LOX are expressed and up-regulated in a quite large number of cancer cells and human tumors, including lung, colon, prostate, breast, and mesothelioma. ,,
COX exists in two isoforms commonly referred to as COX-1 and COX-2. They are the products of two distinct genes localized to chromosomes 9 and 1, respectively. , Both enzymes carry out essentially the same catalytic reaction and have similar primary protein structures.  Normally, COX-1 is constitutively expressed in a broad range of cells and tissues. , In contrast, COX-2 is an immediate early response gene and its expression is normally absent in most cells and tissues but it is highly induced in response to pro-inflammatory cytokines, hormones, and tumor promoters. 
COX-2 expression contributes significantly to the tumorigenic potential of epithelial cells by increasing adhesion to extracellular matrix and making them resistant to apoptosis.  Over-expression of COX-2 in cancer cells induces the production of angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor.  COX-2 derived PGE2 is a pro-inflammatory bioactive lipid and is the major prostaglandin produced in many human solid tumors, including cancer of the colon, stomach, and breast. ,, By binding to its cytoplasmic or nuclear receptors, PGE2 promotes angiogenesis, effects changes in cellular migration and invasive potential, alters cell cycle progression, reduces apoptosis, and inhibits immune surveillance; each of these factors contributes to the malignant phenotype.  PGE2 was also reported to trans-activate epidermal growth factor receptor. 
Three forms of 12-lipoxygenase (12-LOX) have been identified, "leukocyte-type" and "platelet-type" [12(S) LOXs], and a "skin-type" [12(R) LOX]. These differ in tissue localization, substrate specificities, immunogenicities and sequence homology. The leukocyte-type 12-LOX has also been found in other tissues, including the rat pineal gland and human adrenal gland. The platelet-type 12-LOX has thus far been found only in platelets and human epidermal cells. Therapeutic agents that either activate or inhibit 12-lipo-oxygenase may be useful in treatment of atherosclerosis, hypertensive disorders, diabetes, and metastatic diseases. Both isoforms of 12-LOX have recently been cloned.  12-LOX directs arachidonate metabolism towards the formation of Lipoxin A4 (LXA4). LXA4 is reported to have anti-inflammatory properties, inhibit leukocyte adhesion by affecting L-selectin and CD11/18  and enhance necrosis. 
On cancer cells, actions of 12-LOX are similar to 5-LOX and COX-2, since it stimulates proliferation and may be pro-angiogenic.  It enhances angiogenesis and growth of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells in athymic nude mice. 
The aim of this study was to detect the incidence and significance of COX-2 and 12-LOX in operable BC through their effects on OS and DFS and also their correlations with various prognostic factors. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report about the incidence and prognostic significance of COX-2 and 12-LOX in BC patients from Egypt.
Materials and Methods
This prospective study included a total of 57 females with operable BC consecutively presented to the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt (NCI-Egypt). NCI-Egypt is the largest cancer hospital in the Middle East. It includes 550 beds serving all cancer-related specialties. Recruitment of cases was between December 2000 and February 2003. They were followed until May 2006. The study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board and all the patients consented to participate in the study. Inclusion criteria were histologically confirmed BC, female sex, age 18 years or more, operable BC, performance status (World Health Organization) 0-2, adequate organ functions, adequate hematologic parameters (absolute neutrophil count >1.5 x 10 9 /l and platelets >100 x 10 9 /l); creatinine level examination, routine blood tests, chest X-ray and abdomino-pelvic ultrasound. CT scans of the chest/abdomen/pelvis or isotopic bone scan were done as dictated by the stage of the disease. All treatment strategies employed were according to the institutional practice guidelines. Tissues were obtained at first surgery. The major part is formalin-fixed and then paraffin-embedded and assessed according to the standard pathologic techniques. Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) statuses were assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Cases were considered positive for ER or PR when they showed a nuclear staining in more than 5% of tumor cells. Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2/neu) status was assessed by IHC. The HercepTest® scoring system was applied; negative = no membrane staining or 10% of the cells; 2+ = >10% of the cells with weak to moderate complete staining; and 3+ = strong and complete membrane staining in >10% of the cells. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) technique was not used to verify HER2/neu with a score of 2+. Parts of the BC tissues and their corresponding matched adjacent normal tissues were frozen in liquid nitrogen at -80°C. Total RNA from tissues was extracted and stored at -70°C until assaying by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). PCR products were separated on a 2% agarose gel and the intensity of bands was measured. COX-2 or 12-LOX was defined positive when their percent of intensity was greater by 5% than the control. 
The study end points were disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Statistical analysis was performed using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) software for PC (version 13). Chi-square test was used to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference in the expression of COX-2 and 12-LOX between the cancer specimen and the corresponding adjacent normal specimen. Also, Chi square test was used to analyze the statistical correlation between the over-expression of COX-2 and 12-LOX with various clinico-pathological factors. P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. DFS and OS were both determined by the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method,  and the confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using methods for exact binomial CIs. 
The median age of the 57 women with operable BC included in this study was 45 years (ranged between 27-74 years). [Table 1] shows a summary of the patients' characteristics. Fifty-three percent of the patients were premenopausal and 75% had stage III disease. Only 25% of patients had conservative breast surgery (CBS). The rest of the patients had modified radical mastectomy (MRM). The mean tumor size was 6 cm. The mean number of positive axillary lymph nodes was 7. Adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy, hormonal therapy (tamoxifen) and radiotherapy were used in 83, 60 and 75% respectively.
Using IHC technique, 60% patients had hormone receptor positive tumors defined by positivity for ER and/or PR, while only 28% over-expressed HER2/neu (3+). Using RT-PCR, 49% and 65% patients had over-expression of COX-2 and 12-LOX as compared to their corresponding normal adjacent tissues respectively [Table 2].
By the end of the study, 25 patients (44%) had loco-regional or distant disease recurrence. Seventeen patients had only one site of recurrence [Table 3].
Patients who developed visceral metastases (lung and/or liver) were more likely to have COX-2 over-expression at the time of initial diagnosis compared to the rest of the patients ( P 0.028). Patients who developed visceral metastases did not have 12-LOX over-expression at the time of initial diagnosis compared to the rest of the patients ( P 0.07). COX-2 and 12-LOX expression did not vary in relation to the number of metastatic sites.
COX-2 and 12-LOX expressions were correlated with age (up to 35 years or more), menopausal status, hormone receptor (HR) status, tumor grade, tumor stage, lymph node stage and TNM stage. COX-2 over-expression was more likely with higher tumor stage ( P 0.041), nodal stage ( P 0.005) and TNM stage (p 0.003). While insignificant, COX-2 over-expression was more likely with HR-negative ( P 0.15) and in HER2/neu over-expressing tumors ( P 0.2). Over-expression of 12-LOX was not significantly correlated with any item. Expressions of COX-2 and 12-LOX were not correlated with each other.
After a median follow-up period of 36 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 22-50 months], 12 patients died of disease recurrence and an additional 13 patients were alive with evidence of disease recurrence. The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 37 months (95% CI: 30-44 months) [Figure 1]. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached and the mean OS was 40 months (95% CI: 36-45 months) [Figure 2].
Although OS did not differ significantly between patients with normal and over-expression of COX-2, OS was better in patients with tumors normally expressing COX-2 ( P 0.26). The median OS was not reached in both groups. The mean OS was 43 and 35 months in normal and over-expressors of COX-2 respectively (CI: 37-48 and 29-40 months respectively) [Figure 3].
Similarly, OS did not differ significantly between patients with normal and over-expression of 12-LOX ( P 0.17). In contrast to COX-2, OS was better in patients with tumors over-expressing 12-LOX. The median OS was not reached in both groups. The mean OS was 32 and 42 months in normal and over-expressors of 12-LOX respectively (CI: 26-39 and 38-47 months respectively) [Figure 4].
DFS did not differ significantly between patients with normal and over-expression of COX-2 ( P 0.67). The median DFS was not reached in patients with normal COX-2 expression and it was 37 months in patients with COX-2 over-expression (CI: 29-45 months) [Figure 5].
DFS was significantly higher in patients with over-expression of 12-LOX compared to those with normal 12-LOX expression (P 0.045). The median DFS was 37 months in 12-LOX over-expressors (CI could not be calculated), while it was 22 months in 12-LOX normal-expressors (CI: 10-34 months) [Figure 6].
COX-2 is an immediate early response gene and its expression is normally absent in most cells and tissues but it is highly induced in response to pro-inflammatory cytokines, hormones, and tumor promoters.  It is expressed in many tumors including colon, stomach, breast. ,, There is a growing body of evidence that COX-2 expression is a fundamental step in breast cancer pathogenesis acting through prostaglandin-dependent and independent mechanisms.  Several studies have suggested that COX-2 expression is associated with parameters of aggressive breast cancer, including large tumor size, positive axillary lymph node metastases, ER negative and HER2-positive tumor status. 
Similar to other studies, ,,,,,, we reported that 49% of the 57 patients with operable BC over-expressed COX-2. However, other authors reported very high COX-2 expression up to 80% or more. ,,,, The reason for this variation is unknown and may be related to racial variation or different methodologies (IHC, RT-PCR or Microarray).
Similar to our study, other investigators have found a significant correlation between COX-2 over-expression and larger tumor size, higher nodal stage and higher TNM stage. ,, However, these significant correlations were not shown in the studies reporting very high rate of COX-2 over-expression exceeding 80%, ,, so that almost all the patients, whether of low or high stage, had COX-2 over-expression. Similar to other investigators, ,,,, we failed to show significant correlations between COX-2 over-expression and ER negativity, Her2/neu over-expression, higher tumor grade or patients' age. Contrary to our study, Wulfing et al. and Ristimaki et al. reported a significant correlation between COX-2 over-expression and ER negativity, Her2/neu over-expression and higher tumor grade. , Smaller patients' number, absence of grade 1 and few grade 3 tumors in addition to lack of FISH confirmation of immuno-histochemnistry Hercep Test (R) score of 2+, in our study, may explain the controversy.
Similar to our study, other investigators ,, have found that DFS and OS did not differ significantly between patients with low and those with high COX-2 expression. On the contrary, poor DFS and OS in patients with COX-2 over-expression were reported by other authors. ,, The relatively smaller number of patients in our study might be a reason for the difference not reaching a statistical significance.
Over-expression of 12-LOX was not significantly correlated with age, menopausal status, HR status, tumor size, tumor grade, lymph node stage and TNM stage. OS tended to be higher in patients with over-expression of 12-LOX compared to those with normal expression (p 0.17). DFS was significantly better in patients with over-expression of 12-LOX compared to those with normal 12-LOX expression ( P 0.045). Our results contradict Connolly et al . whose work was on nude mice.  12-LOX directs arachidonate metabolism towards the formation of Lipoxin A4 that have anti-inflammatory properties, inhibits leukocyte adhesion and enhances necrosis. , All these actions might confer good prognosis in BC.
In conclusion, in our study, COX-2 over-expression was associated with poor prognostic features in operable BC namely, larger tumor size, higher nodal stage and higher TNM stage. OS and DFS appear to be worse with COX-2 over-expression. 12-LOX over-expression was not associated with any prognostic feature in operable BC. It was associated with higher DFS and OS.
|1||Hortobagyi GN, de la Garza Salazar J, Pritchard K, Amadori D, Haidinger R, Hudis CA, et al . The global breast cancer burden: Variations in epidemiology and survival. Clin Breast Cancer 2005;6:391-401.|
|2||Elattar IA, Ali-eldin NH, Moneer MM, Elbasmy AA. Cancer Registry 2002-2003, National Cancer Institute of Egypt. Available from: http://www.nci.edu.eg/lectures/NCI%20registry%202002-03.doc. 2007. p. 46.|
|3||Williams C, Brunskill S, Altman D, Briggs A, Campbell H, Clarke M, et al . Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy. Health Technol Assess 2006;10:iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204.|
|4||Spizzo G, Gastl G, Wolf D, Gunsilius E, Steurer M, Fong D, et al . Correlation of COX-2 and Ep-CAM overexpression in human invasive breast cancer and its impact on survival. Br J Cancer 2003;88:574-8.|
|5||Park K, Han S, Shin E, Kim HJ, Kim JY. Cox-2 expression on tissue microarray of breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006;32:10936-.|
|6||Wulfing P, Diallo R, Muller C, Wulfing C, Poremba C, Heinecke A, et al . Analysis of cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human breast cancer: high throughput tissue microarray analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2003;129:375-82.|
|7||Ristimaki A, Sivula A, Lundin J, Lundin M, Salminen T, Haglund C, et al . Prognostic significance of elevated cyclooxygenase-2 expression in breast cancer. Cancer Res 2002;62:632-5.|
|8||Ranger GS, Thomas V, Jewell A, Mokbel K. Elevated cyclooxygenase-2 expression correlates with distant metastases in breast cancer. Anticancer Res 2004;24:2349-51.|
|9||O′Connor JK, Avent J, Lee RJ, Fischbach J, Gaffney DK. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression correlates with diminished survival in invasive breast cancer treated with mastectomy and radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;58:1034-40.|
|10||Connolly JM, Rose DP. Enhanced angiogenesis and growth of 12-lipoxygenase gene-transfected MCF-7 human breast cancer cells in athymic nude mice. Cancer Lett 1998;132:107-12.|
|11||Ara G, Teicher BA. Cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase inhibitors in cancer therapy. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 1996;54:3-16.|
|12||Hong SH, Avis I, Vos MD, Martinez A, Treston AM, Mulshine JL. Relationship of arachidonic acid metabolizing enzyme expression in epithelial cancer cell lines to the growth effect of selective biochemical inhibitors. Cancer Res 1999;59:2223-8.|
|13||Romano M, Catalano A, Nutini M, D′Urbano E, Crescenzi C, Claria J, et al . 5-lipoxygenase regulates malignant mesothelial cell survival: involvement of vascular endothelial growth factor. FASEB J 2001;15:2326-36.|
|14||Nie D, Hillman GG, Geddes T, Tang K, Pierson C, Grignon DJ, et al . Platelet-type 12-lipoxygenase in a human prostate carcinoma stimulates angiogenesis and tumor growth. Cancer Res 1998;58:4047-51.|
|15||Funk CD, Funk LB, Kennedy ME, Pong AS, Fitzgerald GA. Human platelet/erythroleukemia cell prostaglandin G/H synthase: cDNA cloning, expression, and gene chromosomal assignment. FASEB J 1991;5:2304-12.|
|16||Tay A, Squire JA, Goldberg H, Skorecki K. Assignment of the human prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2) gene to 1q25 by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genomics 1994;23:718-9.|
|17||Smith WL, Garavito RM, DeWitt DL. Prostaglandin endoperoxide H synthases (cyclooxygenases)-1 and -2. J Biol Chem 1996;271:33157-60.|
|18||Grosser T, Yusuff S, Cheskis E, Pack MA, FitzGerald GA. Developmental expression of functional cyclooxygenases in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:8418-23.|
|19||Cha YI, Kim SH, Solnica-Krezel L, Dubois RN. Cyclooxygenase-1 signaling is required for vascular tube formation during development. Dev Biol 2005;282:274-83.|
|20||Dubois RN, Abramson SB, Crofford L, Gupta RA, Simon LS, Van De Putte LB, et al . Cyclooxygenase in biology and disease. FASEB J 1998;12:1063-73.|
|21||Tsujii M, DuBois RN. Alterations in cellular adhesion and apoptosis in epithelial cells overexpressing prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 2. Cell 1995;83:493-501.|
|22||Tsujii M, Kawano S, Tsuji S, Sawaoka H, Hori M, DuBois RN. Cyclooxygenase regulates angiogenesis induced by colon cancer cells. Cell 1998;93:705-16.|
|23||Rigas B, Goldman IS, Levine L. Altered eicosanoid levels in human colon cancer. J Lab Clin Med 1993;122:518-23.|
|24||Rolland PH, Martin PM, Jacquemier J, Rolland AM, Toga M. Prostaglandin in human breast cancer: Evidence suggesting that an elevated prostaglandin production is a marker of high metastatic potential for neoplastic cells. J Natl Cancer Inst 1980;64:1061-70.|
|25||Uefuji K, Ichikura T, Mochizuki H. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression is related to prostaglandin biosynthesis and angiogenesis in human gastric cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:135-8.|
|26||Wang D, Dubois RN. Prostaglandins and cancer. Gut 2006;55:115-22.|
|27||Pai R, Soreghan B, Szabo IL, Pavelka M, Baatar D, Tarnawski AS. Prostaglandin E2 transactivates EGF receptor: A novel mechanism for promoting colon cancer growth and gastrointestinal hypertrophy. Nat Med 2002;8:289-93.|
|28||Chen XS, Kurre U, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, Funk CD. cDNA cloning, expression, mutagenesis of C-terminal isoleucine, genomic structure and chromosomal localizations of murine 12-lipoxygenases. J Biol Chem 1994;269:13979-87.|
|29||Rodriguez M, Clare-Salzler M. Eicosanoid imbalance in the NOD mouse is related to a dysregulation in soluble epoxide hydrolase and 15-PGDH expression. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006;1079:130-4.|
|30||Chen M, Remold HG. Opposing roles of PGE2 and LXA4 in the regulation of necrosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infected macrophages. Abstract 174. In: j immunol, editor. The American Association of Immunologists; 2007; 2007.|
|31||Sweeney CJ, Marshall MS, Barnard DS, Heilman DK, Billings SD, Cheng L, et al . Cyclo-oxygenase-2 expression in primary cancers of the lung and bladder compared to normal adjacent tissue. Cancer Detect Prev 2002;26:238-44.|
|32||Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457-81.|
|33||Cox DR. The analysis of binary data. London, UK: Methuen; 1970.|
|34||Singh-Ranger G, Salhab M, Mokbel K. The role of cyclooxygenase-2 in breast cancer: Review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008;109:189-98.|
|35||Arun B, Goss P. The role of COX-2 inhibition in breast cancer treatment and prevention. Semin Oncol 2004;31:22-9.|
|36||Ranger GS, Jewell A, Thomas V, Mokbel K. Elevated expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ has no correlation with established prognostic markers. J Surg Oncol 2004;88:100-3.|
|37||Watanabe O, Shimizu T, Imamura H, Kinoshita J, Utada Y, Okabe T, et al . Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in malignant and benign breast tumors. Anticancer Res 2003;23:3215-21.|
|38||Lim SC. Role of COX-2, VEGF and cyclin D1 in mammary infiltrating duct carcinoma. Oncol Rep 2003;10:1241-9.|
|39||Nassar A, Radhakrishnan A, Cabrero IA, Cotsonis G, Cohen C. COX-2 expression in invasive breast cancer: Correlation with prognostic parameters and outcome. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2007;15:255-9.|
|40||McCarthy K, Bustin SA, Ogunkolade B, Khalaf S, Laban CA, McVittie CJ, et al . Cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) mRNA expression and hormone receptor status in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006;32:707-9.|
|41||Guo GL, Yao ZX, Wu J. The clinical significance of expression of cyclooxygenase-2 gene in breast cancer. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2003;83:1661-4.|
|42||Kelly LM, Hill AD, Kennedy S, Connolly EM, Ramanath R, Teh S, et al . Lack of prognostic effect of Cox-2 expression in primary breast cancer on short-term follow-up. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003;29:707-10.|
|43||Davies G, Salter J, Hills M, Martin LA, Sacks N, Dowsett M. Correlation between cyclooxygenase-2 expression and angiogenesis in human breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:2651-6.|
|44||Nakopoulou L, Mylona E, Papadaki I, Kapranou A, Giannopoulou I, Markaki S, et al . Overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 is associated with a favorable prognostic phenotype in breast carcinoma. Pathobiology 2005;72:241-9.|